Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980066›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

pBACode: a random-barcode-based high-throughput approach for BAC paired-end sequencing and physical clone mapping.

Xiaolin Wei, Zhichao Xu, Guixing Wang, Jilun Hou, Xiaopeng Ma, Haijin Liu, Jiadong Liu, Bo Chen, Meizhong Luo, Bingyan Xie and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolin WeiMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Zhichao XuMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Guixing WangBeidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China.
Jilun HouBeidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China.
Xiaopeng MaMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Haijin LiuBeidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China.
Jiadong LiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Bo ChenNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Meizhong LuoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Bingyan XieInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Ruiqiang LiNovogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing 100083, China.
Jue RuanAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518120, China.
Xiao LiuMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNPeking University · CNAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers · CNNovogene Bioinformatics Institute · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applications that use Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) libraries often require paired-end sequences and knowledge of the physical location of each clone in plates. To facilitate obtaining this information in high-throughput, we generated pBACode vectors: a pool of BAC cloning vectors, each with a pair of random barcodes flanking its cloning site. In a pBACode BAC library, the BAC ends and their linked barcodes can be sequenced in bulk. Barcode pairs are determined by sequencing the empty pBACode vectors, which allows BAC ends to be paired according to their barcodes. For physical clone mapping, the barcodes are used as unique markers for their linked genomic sequence. After multi-dimensional pooling of BAC clones, the barcodes are sequenced and deconvoluted to locate each clone. We generated a pBACode library of 94,464 clones for the flounder Paralichthys olivaceus and obtained paired-end sequence from 95.4% of the clones. Incorporating BAC paired-ends into the genome preassembly improved its continuity by over 10-fold. Furthermore, we were able to use the barcodes to map the physical locations of each clone in just 50 pools, with up to 11 808 clones per pool. Our physical clone mapping located 90.2% of BAC clones, enabling targeted characterization of chromosomal rearrangements.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCloning, MolecularAnimalsFlounderGene LibraryGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhysical Chromosome MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27980066
PMCPMC5397170
OpenAlexW2565818503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.