Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27979825›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2017

Critical role of microbiota within cecal crypts on the regenerative capacity of the intestinal epithelium following surgical stress.

Alexander Zaborin, Monika Krezalek, Sanjiv Hyoju, Jennifer R Defazio, Namrata Setia, Natalia Belogortseva, Vytautas P Bindokas, Qiti Guo, Olga Zaborina, John C Alverdy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of the Microbiota in Regeneration-Associated Processes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Use of organoids to study regenerative responses to intestinal damage.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander ZaborinDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Monika KrezalekDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Sanjiv HyojuDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jennifer R DefazioDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Namrata SetiaPathology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Natalia BelogortsevaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Vytautas P BindokasIntegrated Light Microscopy Core Facility, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Qiti GuoThe James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Olga ZaborinaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
John C AlverdyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; jalverdy@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USSchool of the Art Institute of Chicago · US

Funding

PSEUDOMONAS'EFFECTS ON THE GUT BARRIER FROM SURGERYR01GM062344 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALVERDY, JOHN C · 2001 to 2025
$9.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cecal crypts represent a unique niche that are normally occupied by the commensal microbiota. Due to their density and close proximity to stem cells, microbiota within cecal crypts may modulate epithelial regeneration. Here we demonstrate that surgical stress, a process that invariably involves a short period of starvation, antibiotic exposure, and tissue injury, results in cecal crypt evacuation of their microbiota. Crypts devoid of their microbiota display pathophysiological features characterized by abnormal stem cell activation as judged by leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) staining, expansion of the proliferative zone toward the tips of the crypts, and an increase in apoptosis. In addition, crypts devoid of their microbiota display loss of their regenerative capacity as assessed by their ability to form organoids ex vivo. When a four-member human pathogen community isolated from the stool of a critically ill patient is introduced into the cecum of mice with empty crypts, crypts become occupied by the pathogens and further disruption of crypt homeostasis is observed. Fecal microbiota transplantation restores the cecal crypts' microbiota, normalizes homeostasis within crypts, and reestablishes crypt regenerative capacity. Taken together, these findings define an emerging role for the microbiota within cecal crypts to maintain epithelial cell homeostasis in a manner that may enhance recovery in response to the physiological stress imposed by the process of surgery. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: This study provides novel insight into the process by which surgical injury places the intestinal epithelium at risk for colonization by pathogenic microbes and impairment of its regenerative capacity via loss of its microbiota. We show that fecal transplant restores crypt homeostasis in association with repopulation of the microbiota within cecal crypts.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsCecumGene Expression RegulationHomeostasisIntestinal MucosaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledLgr5 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledapoptosiscecal crypt microbiotaepithelial regenerationfecal microbial transplantLgr5proliferative zonesurgical stress

Identifiers

PMID27979825
PMCPMC5338606
OpenAlexW2565359054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.