Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27979797›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Feasibility and Safety of Repeat Instant Endovascular Interventions in Patients with Refractory Cerebral Vasospasms.

L Andereggen, J Beck, W J Z'Graggen, G Schroth, R H Andres, M Murek, M Haenggi, M Reinert, A Raabe, J Gralla

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

L AndereggenFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-1764-688X
J BeckFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-7687-6098
W J Z'GraggenFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-5684-4419
G SchrothInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (L.A., G.S., J.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-5264-9405
R H AndresFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-4485-8968
M MurekFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-9874-1135
M HaenggiIntensive Care Medicine (M.H.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-031X
M ReinertFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-0971-9543
A RaabeFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (L.A., J.B., W.J.Z., R.H.A., M.M., M.R., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-3886-466X
J GrallaInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (L.A., G.S., J.G.) jan.gralla@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1953-9033
MACOM (United States) · USGirls Incorporated · USUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFor patients with cerebral vasospasm refractory to medical and hemodynamic therapies, endovascular therapies often remain the last resort. Data from studies in large cohorts on the efficacy and safety of multiple immediate endovascular interventions are sparse. Our aim was to assess the feasibility and safety of multiple repeat instant endovascular interventions in patients with cerebral vasospasm refractory to medical, hemodynamic, and initial endovascular interventions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data on patients with cerebral vasospasm refractory to therapies requiring ≥3 endovascular interventions during the course of treatment following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The primary end point was functional outcome at last follow-up (mRS ≤2). The secondary end point was angiographic response to endovascular therapies and the appearance of cerebral infarctions.

resultsDuring a 4-year period, 365 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were treated at our institution. Thirty-one (8.5%) met the inclusion criteria. In 52 (14%) patients, ≤2 endovascular interventions were performed as rescue therapy for refractory cerebral vasospasm. At last follow-up, a good outcome was noted in 18 (58%) patients with ≥3 interventions compared with 31 (61%) of those with ≤2 interventions (

conclusionsRepeat instant endovascular intervention is an aggressive but feasible last resort treatment strategy with a favorable outcome in two-thirds of patients with refractory cerebral vasospasm and in whom endovascular treatment has already been initiated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubarachnoid HemorrhageTreatment OutcomeVasospasm, Intracranial

Identifiers

PMID27979797
PMCPMC7959985
OpenAlexW2561817978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.