Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27979752›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

Applying self-determination theory to the blood donation context: The blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) trial.

Christopher R France, Janis L France, Bruce W Carlson, Victoria Frye, Louisa Duffy, Debra A Kessler, Mark Rebosa, Beth H Shaz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher R FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA. Electronic address: France@ohio.edu.
Janis L FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Bruce W CarlsonDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Victoria FryeNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Louisa DuffyNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Debra A KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mark RebosaNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Beth H ShazNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Cellular/Molecular Basis of Development: Research CenterG12MD007603 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PEZZANO, MARK · 2012 to 2017
$11.5M
Blood Donor Competence, Autonomy and Relatedness Enhancement (Blood Donor CARE)R01HL127766 · NHLBI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANCE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127766NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Blood Donor Competency, Autonomy, and Relatedness Enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) project was designed as a practical application of self-determination theory to encourage retention of first-time donors. Self-determination theory proposes that people are more likely to persist with behaviors that are internally-motivated, and that externally-motivated behavior can evolve and become internalized given the appropriate socio-environmental conditions. According to self-determination theory, motivation to engage in blood donation may become increasingly self-determined if the behavior satisfies fundamental human needs for competence (a sense of self-efficacy to achieve specific goals), autonomy (a sense of volitional control over one's behavior), and relatedness (a sense of connection to a larger group). The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the effect of competence, autonomy, and/or relatedness interventions on donor retention. Using a full factorial design, first-time donors will be assigned to a control condition or one of seven intervention conditions. Donation competence, autonomy, and relatedness, along with additional constructs associated with return donation, will be assessed before and after the intervention using online surveys, and donation attempts will be tracked for one-year using blood center donor databases. We hypothesize that, compared to the control condition, the interventions will increase the likelihood of a subsequent donation attempt. We will also examine intervention-specific increases in competence, autonomy, and relatedness as potential mediators of enhanced donor retention. By promoting first-time donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness our goal is to enhance internal motivation for giving and in so doing increase the likelihood of future donation.

Indexed as

MotivationPersonal AutonomySelf EfficacyAdolescentAttitude to HealthBlood DonorsFemaleHumansIntentionMalePersonal SatisfactionSocial NormsYoung AdultBlood donationClinical trialInternal motivational

Identifiers

PMID27979752
PMCPMC5274558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.