Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27978780›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Context as a drug: some consequences of placebo research for primary care.

P Lucassen, F Olesen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Managing functional disorders: opportunities and threats.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P Lucassena Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre , the Netherlands.
F Olesenb Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health , Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOn the basis of emerging research evidence, this review aims to discuss the importance of the context surrounding the doctor-patient encounter for the success of treatment. DESIGN AND

settingDiscussion paper based on placebo-nocebo and pain studies conducted in the western world.

main outcome measuresLiterature-based theory about impact of communication elements on seriousness of symptoms in clinical practice.

resultsThe therapeutic outcome seems to be impacted by rituals around a clinical encounter and by the doctor patient communication and relation. A warm, friendly and empathic attitude is crucial in the first contact with the practice and during the consultation as it influences the patient's perceived outcome. It is important to raise positive expectations when discussing the prognosis, conducting treatment and prescribing medications as the effect may be reduced if the physician expresses doubt about the effectiveness of the medication. Additionally, overly focus on side effects in the doctor-patient conversation about proposed treatments seems to influence the magnitude of perceived side effects in the patient. Thus, shared decision-making might be a desirable tool for ensuring better expectations in the patient and successful symptom relief.

conclusionsThe context of the doctor-patient interplay matters. Placebo-nocebo research provides strong evidence for this link. The therapeutic context induces biomedical processes in the patient's brain that may enhance or reduce the effects of chosen interventions. The context thus works as a drug, with real effects and side effects. KEY POINTS Increased awareness of the context drug may help GPs alleviate symptoms and better motivate patients for treatment. Treatment is affected by multiple types of context, as also confirmed by placebo-nocebo research. The therapeutic context influences the biomedical processes, which may enhance or reduce intervention effects on symptoms. The impact of context should be considered in daily general practice as it may serve as a drug, with real effects and side effects.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiomedical ResearchCommunicationDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsPlacebo EffectPrimary Health CareDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPainTreatment OutcomeUncertaintycontextDenmarkdoctor–patient relationgeneral practicenoceboPlaceboshared decision-makingsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID27978780
PMCPMC5217288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.