ArticleJAMA oncology2017
Universal Genetic Testing for Younger Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot Trial of Streamlined Genetic Education and Traceback Genetic Testing in Prostate Cancer Survivors.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023Trial
- Histone Acyl Code in Precision Oncology: Mechanistic Insights from Dietary and Metabolic Factors.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Epidemiology and Mechanisms of the Increasing Incidence of Colon and Rectal Cancers in Young Adults.Gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Recent progress in Lynch syndrome and other familial colorectal cancer syndromes.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2018Review
- Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission.The Lancet. Oncology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27978567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.