Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27978410›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2016

Influences and Practices in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Health Care Providers Serving Northern Plains American Indians, 2011-2012.

Melanie Nadeau, Anne Walaszek, David G Perdue, Kristine L Rhodes, Donald Haverkamp, Jean Forster

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Colorectal Cancer in the American Indian and Alaska Native Community: A Holistic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Trends among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 2010-2015.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie NadeauNorth Dakota State University, Dept 2662, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050. Email: melanie.nadeau@ndsu.edu.
Anne WalaszekAmerican Indian Cancer Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David G PerdueMinnesota Gastroenterology PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kristine L RhodesAmerican Indian Cancer Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Donald HaverkampCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Jean ForsterUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
American Indian Cancer Foundation · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinnesota Gastroenterology · USNorth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

CDC HHS HHSI236201000006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe epidemiology of colorectal cancer, including incidence, mortality, age of onset, stage of diagnosis, and screening, varies regionally among American Indians. The objective of the Improving Northern Plains American Indian Colorectal Cancer Screening study was to improve understanding of colorectal cancer screening among health care providers serving Northern Plains American Indians.

methodsData were collected, in person, from a sample of 145 health care providers at 27 health clinics across the Northern Plains from May 2011 through September 2012. Participants completed a 32-question, self-administered assessment designed to assess provider practices, screening perceptions, and knowledge.

resultsThe proportion of providers who ordered or performed at least 1 colorectal cancer screening test for an asymptomatic, average-risk patient in the previous month was 95.9% (139 of 145). Of these 139 providers, 97.1% ordered colonoscopies, 12.9% ordered flexible sigmoidoscopies, 73.4% ordered 3-card, guaiac-based, fecal occult blood tests, and 21.6% ordered fecal immunochemical tests. Nearly two-thirds (64.7%) reported performing in-office guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests using digital rectal examination specimens. Providers who reported receiving a formal update on colorectal cancer screening during the previous 24 months were more likely to screen using digital rectal exam specimens than providers who had received a formal update on colorectal cancer screening more than 24 months prior (73.9% vs 56.9%, respectively, χ

conclusionDespite recommendations cautioning against the use of digital rectal examination specimens for colorectal cancer screening, the practice is common among providers serving Northern Plains American Indian populations. Accurate up-to-date, ongoing education for patients, the community, and health care providers is needed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIndians, North AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareEarly Detection of CancerHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMass ScreeningQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27978410
PMCPMC5201146
OpenAlexW2560663440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.