Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27977698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Age Effects on Hypocotyl Mechanics.

Friederike Saxe, Susann Weichold, Antje Reinecke, Jan Lisec, Anett Döring, Lutz Neumetzler, Ingo Burgert, Michaela Eder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Friederike SaxeDepartment of Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2569-1173
Susann WeicholdDepartment of Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Antje ReineckeDepartment of Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Jan LisecPlant Cell Wall Group, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Anett DöringPlant Cell Wall Group, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Lutz NeumetzlerPlant Cell Wall Group, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Ingo BurgertDepartment of Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Michaela EderDepartment of Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies deal with composition and molecular processes involved in primary cell wall formation and alteration in Arabidopsis. However, it still remains difficult to assess the relation between physiological properties and mechanical function at the cell wall level. The thin and fragile structure of primary cell walls and their large biological variability, partly related to structural changes during growth, make mechanical experiments challenging. Since, to the best of our knowledge, there is no reliable data in the literature about how the properties of the fully elongated zone of hypocotyls change with age. We studied in a series of experiments on two different seed batches the tensile properties the region below the growth zone of 4 to 7 day old etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Additionally, we analysed geometrical parameters, hypocotyl density and cellulose content as individual traits and their relation to tissue mechanics. No significant differences of the mechanical parameters of the non-growing region between 5-7 day old plants could be found whereas in 4 day old plants both tensile stiffness and ultimate tensile stress were significantly lower than in the older plants. Furthermore hypocotyl diameters and densities remain almost the same for 5, 6 and 7 day old seedlings. Naturally, hypocotyl lengths increase with age. The evaluation whether the choice-age or length-influences the mechanical properties showed that both are equally applicable sampling parameters. Additionally, our detailed study allows for the estimation of biological variability, connections between mechanics and hypocotyl age could be established and complement the knowledge on biochemistry and genetics affecting primary plant cell wall growth. The application of two different micromechanical devices for testing living Arabidopsis hypocotyls allows for emphasizing and discussing experimental limitations and for presenting a wide range of possibilities to address current and future questions related to plant cell wall mechanics, synthesis and growth in combination with molecular biology methodologies.

Indexed as

AgingArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCelluloseCell WallGene Expression Regulation, PlantHypocotylTensile StrengthArabidopsis ProteinsCellulose

Identifiers

PMID27977698
PMCPMC5158002
OpenAlexW2562792703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.