Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27977284›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of orthopsychiatry2017

Adaptation and implementation of a trauma-focused cognitive behavioral intervention for girls in child welfare.

Wendy Auslander, Hollee McGinnis, Sarah Tlapek, Penny Smith, April Foster, Tonya Edmond, Jerry Dunn

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy AuslanderGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Hollee McGinnisGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Sarah TlapekGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Penny SmithGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
April FosterGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Tonya EdmondGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Jerry DunnGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
BROWN CENTER FOR VIOLENCE AND INJURY PREVENTIONR49CE001510 · CE · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JONSON-REID, MELISSA A · 2009 to 2013
$4.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE001510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the process of adapting and implementing Girls Aspiring toward Independence (GAIN), a trauma-focused, group-based therapy adapted from Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS) for girls in child welfare. Descriptive data were examined on 3 outcomes: posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and social problem-solving skills among adolescent girls in the child welfare system. Qualitative and quantitative methods were utilized to inform the adaptation of the CBITS intervention, evaluate feasibility, treatment fidelity, and acceptability, and to test the effects of the intervention. Girls ages 12 to 18 (N = 27) were randomly assigned to the experimental and usual care conditions. Participants' symptoms of PTSD and depression and social problem-solving skills were evaluated at pre, post- (3 months), and follow-up (6 months) assessments. Adaptations for GAIN were primarily related to program structure. Data indicated that the program was receptive to girls in child welfare and that it was feasible to recruit, randomize, assess outcomes, and implement with adequate fidelity. Retention was more successful among younger girls. Descriptive initial data showed greater reductions in the percentage of girls with PTSD and depression, and modest increases in social problem-solving skills in the experimental versus usual care condition. Despite the growth of knowledge in dissemination and implementation research, the application of trauma-focused empirically supported treatment to child welfare populations lags behind. A large-scale RCT is needed to determine if GAIN is effective in reducing mental health problems and social problem-solving in the child welfare population. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild WelfareCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionProblem SolvingPsychotherapy, GroupSocial SkillsStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID27977284
PMCPMC5426970
OpenAlexW2562477040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.