Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27977000›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Spinal microcircuits comprising dI3 interneurons are necessary for motor functional recovery following spinal cord transection.

Tuan V Bui, Nicolas Stifani, Turgay Akay, Robert M Brownstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Autogenic spinal excitatory circuit ensures skilled hand movements in primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Activity of spinal RORβ neurons is related to functional improvements following combination treatment after complete SCI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuroplasticity and regeneration after spinal cord injury.North American Spine Society journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tuan V BuiDepartment of Biology, Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-1544
Nicolas StifaniDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8584-9561
Turgay AkayDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Robert M BrownstoneDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-2725

Funding

CIHR FRN 79413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord has the capacity to coordinate motor activities such as locomotion. Following spinal transection, functional activity can be regained, to a degree, following motor training. To identify microcircuits involved in this recovery, we studied a population of mouse spinal interneurons known to receive direct afferent inputs and project to intermediate and ventral regions of the spinal cord. We demonstrate that while dI3 interneurons are not necessary for normal locomotor activity, locomotor circuits rhythmically inhibit them and dI3 interneurons can activate these circuits. Removing dI3 interneurons from spinal microcircuits by eliminating their synaptic transmission left locomotion more or less unchanged, but abolished functional recovery, indicating that dI3 interneurons are a necessary cellular substrate for motor system plasticity following transection. We suggest that dI3 interneurons compare inputs from locomotor circuits with sensory afferent inputs to compute sensory prediction errors that then modify locomotor circuits to effect motor recovery.

Indexed as

Motor ActivitySpinal Cord RegenerationAnimalsInterneuronsMiceNeural PathwaysSpinal Cord Injuriescomparator neuronsmotor learningmouseneurosciencesensory prediction errorspinal cord injurytreadmill training

Identifiers

PMID27977000
PMCPMC5218533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.