Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27976718›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Amphibian gut microbiota shifts differentially in community structure but converges on habitat-specific predicted functions.

Molly C Bletz, Daniel J Goedbloed, Eugenia Sanchez, Timm Reinhardt, Christoph C Tebbe, Sabin Bhuju, Robert Geffers, Michael Jarek, Miguel Vences, Sebastian Steinfartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Gut Microbiome of the Asiatic Toad (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Research Status and Prospect of Amphibian Symbiotic Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Molly C BletzZoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.
Daniel J GoedbloedZoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.
Eugenia SanchezZoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.
Timm ReinhardtInstitute for Zoology and Cell Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
Christoph C TebbeORCID 0000-0003-4861-0214
Sabin BhujuHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Genome Analytics, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.
Robert GeffersHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Genome Analytics, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.
Michael JarekHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Genome Analytics, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.
Miguel VencesZoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.
Sebastian SteinfartzZoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex microbial communities inhabit vertebrate digestive systems but thorough understanding of the ecological dynamics and functions of host-associated microbiota within natural habitats is limited. We investigate the role of environmental conditions in shaping gut and skin microbiota under natural conditions by performing a field survey and reciprocal transfer experiments with salamander larvae inhabiting two distinct habitats (ponds and streams). We show that gut and skin microbiota are habitat-specific, demonstrating environmental factors mediate community structure. Reciprocal transfer reveals that gut microbiota, but not skin microbiota, responds differentially to environmental change. Stream-to-pond larvae shift their gut microbiota to that of pond-to-pond larvae, whereas pond-to-stream larvae change to a community structure distinct from both habitat controls. Predicted functions, however, match that of larvae from the destination habitats in both cases. Thus, microbial function can be matched without taxonomic coherence and gut microbiota appears to exhibit metagenomic plasticity.

Indexed as

EcosystemPondsRiversAnimalsEnvironmentGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLarvaMetagenomeMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalamandraSkinRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27976718
PMCPMC5171763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.