Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27975138›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2017

Selection of epitopes from self-antigens for eliciting Th2 or Th1 activity in the treatment of autoimmune disease or cancer.

William C Watt, Denise L Cecil, Mary L Disis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Breast cancer vaccines for treatment and prevention.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Immune Polarization Potential of theFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Cancer and autoimmunity.Seminars in immunopathology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William C WattTumor Vaccine Group, University of Washington, 850 Republican Street, Box 358050, Seattle, WA, 98109-4714, USA.
Denise L CecilTumor Vaccine Group, University of Washington, 850 Republican Street, Box 358050, Seattle, WA, 98109-4714, USA.
Mary L DisisTumor Vaccine Group, University of Washington, 850 Republican Street, Box 358050, Seattle, WA, 98109-4714, USA. ndsis@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USFugro (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have been valuable tools in the prevention of infectious diseases, and the rapid development of new vectors against constantly mutating foreign antigens in viruses such as influenza has become a regular, seasonal exercise. Harnessing the immune response against self-antigens is not necessarily analogous or as achievable by iterative processes, and since the desired outcome includes leaving the targeted organism intact, requires some precision engineering. In vaccine-based treatment of autoimmunity and cancer, the proper selection of antigens and generation of the desired antigen-specific therapeutic immunity has been challenging. Both cases involve a threshold of existing, undesired immunity that must be overcome, and despite considerable academic and industry efforts, this challenge has proven to be largely refractory to vaccine approaches leveraging enhanced vectors, adjuvants, and administration strategies. There are in silico approaches in development for predicting the immunogenicity of self-antigen epitopes, which are being validated slowly. One simple approach showing promise is the functional screening of self-antigen epitopes for selective Th1 antitumor immunogenicity, or inversely, selective Th2 immunogenicity for treatment of autoimmune inflammation. The approach reveals the importance of confirming both Th1 and Th2 components of a vaccine immunogen; the two can confound one another if not parsed but may be used individually to modulate antigen-specific inflammation in autoimmune disease or cancer.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingAnimalsAutoantigensAutoimmune DiseasesAutoimmunityEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyNeoplasmsTh1 CellsTh2 CellsT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerT-Lymphocyte SubsetsVaccinesAutoantigensEpitopes, T-LymphocyteVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27975138
OpenAlexW2566922007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.