Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27974612›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Adaptive Cognitive Control: A High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study.

Oyetunde Gbadeyan, Katie McMahon, Marco Steinhauser, Marcus Meinzer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06634771 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Frontal E/I Balance Mediation of tACS Effects on Behavioral Flexibility

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2024 to 2025Enrolled7ConditionsBehavioral Flexibility, Healthy Volunteers, High Risk Alcohol UseArms10 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), sham transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
NCT06775145 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Effect of Neuromodulation on Anxiety Disorders by High-Definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)ArmsHD-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, HD-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Motor imagery enhances performance beyond the imagined action.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oyetunde GbadeyanCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-0200
Katie McMahonCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia, and.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-615X
Marco SteinhauserDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt 85072, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-6036
Marcus MeinzerCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia, m.meinzer@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflict adaptation is a hallmark effect of adaptive cognitive control and refers to the adjustment of control to the level of previously experienced conflict. Conflict monitoring theory assumes that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is causally involved in this adjustment. However, to date, evidence in humans is predominantly correlational, and heterogeneous with respect to the lateralization of control in the DLPFC. We used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), which allows for more focal current delivery than conventional tDCS, to clarify the causal involvement of the DLPFC in conflict adaptation. Specifically, we investigated the regional specificity and lateralization of potential beneficial stimulation effects on conflict adaptation during a visual flanker task. One hundred twenty healthy participants were assigned to four HD-tDCS conditions: left or right DLPFC or left or right primary motor cortex (M1). Each group underwent both active and sham HD-tDCS in crossover, double-blind designs. We obtained a sizeable conflict adaptation effect (measured as the modulation of the flanker effect as a function of previous response conflict) in all groups and conditions. However, this effect was larger under active HD-tDCS than under sham stimulation in both DLPFC groups. In contrast, active stimulation had no effect on conflict adaptation in the M1 groups. In sum, the present results indicate that the DLPFC plays a causal role in adaptive cognitive control, but that the involvement of DLPFC in control is not restricted to the left or right hemisphere. Moreover, our study confirms the potential of HD-tDCS to modulate cognition in a regionally specific manner. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Conflict adaptation is a hallmark effect of adaptive cognitive control. While animal studies have suggested causal involvement of the DLPFC in this phenomenon, such evidence is currently lacking in humans. The present study used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to demonstrate that the DLPFC is causally involved in conflict adaptation in humans. Our study confirms a central claim of conflict monitoring theory, which up to now has predominantly relied on correlational studies. Our results further indicate an equal involvement of the left and right DLPFC in adaptive control, whereas stimulation of a control region-the primary motor cortex-had no effect on adaptive control. The study thus confirms the potential of HD-tDCS to modulate cognition in a regionally specific manner.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCognitionConflict, PsychologicalCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexReaction TimeYoung Adultbrain stimulationcognitive controlconflict adaptationconflict monitoring theorydorsolateral prefrontal cortexhigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27974612
PMCPMC6705663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.