Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27974523›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Epidemiological models to control the spread of information in marine mammals.

Zachary A Schakner, Michael G Buhnerkempe, Mathew J Tennis, Robert J Stansell, Bjorn K van der Leeuw, James O Lloyd-Smith, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zachary A SchaknerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA zschakner@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-3526
Michael G BuhnerkempeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA Michael.buhnerkempe@gmail.com.
Mathew J TennisPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, 2001 Marine Drive, Room 120, Astoria, OR 97103, USA.
Robert J StansellUS Army Corps of Engineers, Fisheries Field Unit, Post Office Box 150, Cascade Locks, OR 97014, USA.
Bjorn K van der LeeuwUS Army Corps of Engineers, Fisheries Field Unit, Post Office Box 150, Cascade Locks, OR 97014, USA.
James O Lloyd-SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socially transmitted wildlife behaviours that create human-wildlife conflict are an emerging problem for conservation efforts, but also provide a unique opportunity to apply principles of infectious disease control to wildlife management. As an example, California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) have learned to exploit concentrations of migratory adult salmonids below the fish ladders at Bonneville Dam, impeding endangered salmonid recovery. Proliferation of this foraging behaviour in the sea lion population has resulted in a controversial culling programme of individual sea lions at the dam, but the impact of such culling remains unclear. To evaluate the effectiveness of current and alternative culling strategies, we used network-based diffusion analysis on a long-term dataset to demonstrate that social transmission is implicated in the increase in dam-foraging behaviour and then studied different culling strategies within an epidemiological model of the behavioural transmission data. We show that current levels of lethal control have substantially reduced the rate of social transmission, but failed to effectively reduce overall sea lion recruitment. Earlier implementation of culling could have substantially reduced the extent of behavioural transmission and, ultimately, resulted in fewer animals being culled. Epidemiological analyses offer a promising tool to understand and control socially transmissible behaviours.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorLearningAnimal CommunicationAnimalsAnimals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesSea Lionscullinghuman–wildlife conflictnetwork-based diffusionsalmon conservationsocial learningsocial transmission

Identifiers

PMID27974523
PMCPMC5204154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.