Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27974287›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2016

A Test of Concept Study of At-Home, Self-Administered HIV Testing With Web-Based Peer Counseling Via Video Chat for Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Jessica L Maksut, Lisa A Eaton, Elizabeth J Siembida, Daniel D Driffin, Robert Baldwin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Usability Evaluation of the mLab App for Improving Home HIV Testing Behaviors in Youth at Risk of HIV Infection.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Using technology to support HIV self-testing among MSM.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica L MaksutDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-8930
Lisa A EatonDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, United States.
Elizabeth J SiembidaDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-8359
Daniel D DriffinInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, United States.
Robert BaldwinInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, United States.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Novel Stigma/Structural Interventions for Increasing HIV/STI Testing Among BMSMR01MH109409 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI EATON, LISA A · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
Serosorting Intervention for HIV Negative MSMR01MH094230 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI EATON, LISA A · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094230NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM), particularly MSM who identify as African-American or Black (BMSM), are the sociodemographic group that is most heavily burdened by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the United States. To meet national HIV testing goals, there must be a greater emphasis on novel ways to promote and deliver HIV testing to MSM. Obstacles to standard, clinic-based HIV testing include concerns about stigmatization or recognition at in-person testing sites, as well as the inability to access a testing site due to logistical barriers.

objectiveThis study examined the feasibility of self-administered, at-home HIV testing with Web-based peer counseling to MSM by using an interactive video chatting method. The aims of this study were to (1) determine whether individuals would participate in at-home HIV testing with video chat-based test counseling with a peer counselor, (2) address logistical barriers to HIV testing that individuals who report risk for HIV transmission may experience, and (3) reduce anticipated HIV stigma, a primary psychosocial barrier to HIV testing.

methodsIn response to the gap in HIV testing, a pilot study was developed and implemented via mailed, at-home HIV test kits, accompanied by HIV counseling with a peer counselor via video chat. A total of 20 MSM were enrolled in this test of concept study, 80% of whom identified as BMSM.

resultsAll participants reported that at-home HIV testing with a peer counseling via video chat was a satisfying experience. The majority of participants (13/18, 72%) said they would prefer for their next HIV testing and counseling experience to be at home with Web-based video chat peer counseling, as opposed to testing in an office or clinic setting. Participants were less likely to report logistical and emotional barriers to HIV testing at the 6-week and 3-month follow-ups.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that self-administered HIV testing with Web-based peer counseling is feasible and that MSM find it to be a satisfactory means by which they can access their test results. This study can serve as a general guideline for future, larger-scale studies of Web-based HIV test counseling for MSM.

Indexed as

barriers to HIV testingHIV preventionHIV stigmaInternetMSMvideo chatWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID27974287
PMCPMC5196490
OpenAlexW2567558059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.