Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27974258›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2017

Parental Preference Assessment for Vesicoureteral Reflux Management in Children.

Geraldine N Tran, Anand V Bodapati, Jonathan C Routh, Christopher S Saigal, Hillary L Copp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Long-term prognosis of vesicoureteral reflux: a follow-up observation of 138 children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geraldine N TranSchool of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Anand V BodapatiAnderson School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Jonathan C RouthDivision of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher S SaigalDepartment of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Hillary L CoppDepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: hillary.copp@ucsf.edu.

Funding

UCSF KURe Career Development ProgramK12DK083021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE, CARROLL, PETER R · 2008 to 2017
$5.9M
Comparative Effectiveness of Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatments in ChildrenK08DK100534 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUTH, JONATHAN C · 2014 to 2018
$671k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK100534NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK083021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParents of children with vesicoureteral reflux are presented with a variety of management options, which in many cases offer a similar risk-benefit ratio. To facilitate shared decision making, parental preferences regarding vesicoureteral reflux treatment options need to be acknowledged. We aimed to characterize the clinical experience of parents and elicit core themes affecting decision making in regard to managing vesicoureteral reflux in their child. MATERIALS AND

methodsA semistructured, qualitative interview script was developed and vetted by 25 pediatric urologists to discuss treatment options for vesicoureteral reflux. Additional patient interviews were conducted until new themes failed to arise. Content analysis was performed to extract all statements that described treatment options. Similar statements were combined until a final list of unique themes emerged.

resultsA total of 26 interviews were performed, yielding 689 statements about overall parent experiences with managing vesicoureteral reflux in the child and 450 statements (65%) pertaining to treatment options. Of the 13 themes that emerged, those most commonly considered were the prevention of future urinary tract infections by 85% of parents, the efficacy rate of treatment options by 85%, the burden of daily maintenance or compliance by 77%, antibiotic resistance by 69%, chronic kidney damage by 62% and invasiveness by 58%.

conclusionsOur study emphasizes that when choosing a treatment option for vesicoureteral reflux in their child, parent preferences regarding risks and benefits are variable. However, their chief concerns include whether a method decreases the risk of urinary tract infections, has an acceptable efficacy rate and aligns itself with the capabilities of the family. These themes help frame discussions between families and clinicians regarding vesicoureteral reflux management, and they can facilitate shared decision making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleParentsPatient PreferenceRetrospective StudiesVesico-Ureteral Refluxparentspatient preferenceureterurinary bladdervesico-ureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID27974258
PMCPMC5866093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.