ArticlePloS one2016
Bacterial Communities Differ among Drosophila melanogaster Populations and Affect Host Resistance against Parasitoids.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare Taxa and Stochastic Drift Drive the Microbiome Assembly of the Invasive Pest Drosophila suzukii, While Host Filtering Structures the Grape Sour Rot Community.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Genomic structure and life history variation of isofemale lineages of Myzus persicae with different levels of parasitization by Diaeretiella rapae.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbiome transplants may not improve health and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.Biology open · 2025Article
- Host-microbiota matching and epigenetic modulation drive Daphnia magna responses to cyanobacterial stress.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Microbiome Structure of a WildApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Propensity for resistance development in the invasive berry pest, spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii), under laboratory selection.Pest management science · 2022Article
- Article
- Ethnic Specificity of Species and Strain Composition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Microbiome Heritability and Its Role in Adaptation of Hosts to Novel Resources.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- A Population Genomic Investigation of Immune Cell Diversity and Phagocytic Capacity in a Butterfly.Genes · 2021Article
- The Gram-Positive BacteriumInsects · 2020Article
- Article
- Metacommunity theory for transmission of heritable symbionts within insect communities.Ecology and evolution · 2020Review
- Different laboratory populations similar bacterial profile? The case of Glossina palpalis gambiensis.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- Optimization of native biocontrol agents, with parasitoids of the invasive pestEvolutionary applications · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Drosophila, diet is considered a prominent factor shaping the associated bacterial community. However, the host population background (e.g. genotype, geographical origin and founder effects) is a factor that may also exert a significant influence and is often overlooked. To test for population background effects, we characterized the bacterial communities in larvae of six genetically differentiated and geographically distant D. melanogaster lines collected from natural populations across Europe. The diet for these six lines had been identical for ca. 50 generations, thus any differences in the composition of the microbiome originates from the host populations. We also investigated whether induced shifts in the microbiome-in this case by controlled antibiotic administration-alters the hosts' resistance to parasitism. Our data revealed a clear signature of population background on the diversity and composition of D. melanogaster microbiome that differed across lines, even after hosts had been maintained at the same diet and laboratory conditions for over 4 years. In particular, the number of bacterial OTUs per line ranged from 8 to 39 OTUs. Each line harboured 2 to 28 unique OTUs, and OTUs that were highly abundant in some lines were entirely missing in others. Moreover, we found that the response to antibiotic treatment differed among the lines and significantly altered the host resistance to the parasitoid Asobara tabida in one of the six lines. Wolbachia, a widespread intracellular endosymbiont associated with parasitoid resistance, was lacking in this line, suggesting that other components of the Drosophila microbiome caused a change in host resistance. Collectively, our results revealed that lines that originate from different population backgrounds show significant differences in the established Drosophila microbiome, outpacing the long-term effect of diet. Perturbations on these naturally assembled microbiomes to some degree influenced the hosts' resistance against natural parasites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.