Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27973586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Characterization of the Fishing Lines in Titiwai (=Arachnocampa luminosa Skuse, 1890) from New Zealand and Australia.

Janek von Byern, Victoria Dorrer, David J Merritt, Peter Chandler, Ian Stringer, Martina Marchetti-Deschmann, Andrew McNaughton, Norbert Cyran, Karsten Thiel, Michael Noeske and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Janek von ByernLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-0438
Victoria DorrerTechnical University Wien, Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna, Austria.
David J MerrittThe University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Peter ChandlerSpellbound Cave, Waitomo, New Zealand.
Ian StringerDepartment of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Martina Marchetti-DeschmannTechnical University Wien, Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna, Austria.
Andrew McNaughtonUniversity of Otago, School of Medical Sciences, Department of Anatomy, Otago Centre for Confocal Microscopy, Otago, New Zealand.
Norbert CyranUniversity of Vienna, Faculty of Life Science, Core Facility Cell Imaging & Ultrastructure Research, Vienna, Austria.
Karsten ThielFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials, Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Bremen, Germany.
Michael NoeskeFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials, Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Bremen, Germany.
Ingo GrunwaldFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials, Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Bremen, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials · DETU Wien · ATUniversity of Vienna · ATDepartment of Conservation · NZThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals use adhesive secretions in a plethora of ways, either for attachment, egg anchorage, mating or as either active or passive defence. The most interesting function, however, is the use of adhesive threads to capture prey, as the bonding must be performed within milliseconds and under unsuitable conditions (movement of prey, variable environmental conditions, unfavourable attack angle, etc.) to be nonetheless successful. In the following study a detailed characterization of the prey capture system of the world-renowned glowworm group Arachnocampa from the macroscopic to the ultrastructural level is performed. The data reveal that the adhesive droplets consist mostly of water and display hygroscopic properties at varying humidity levels. The droplet core of Arachnocampa luminosa includes a certain amount of the elements sodium, sulphur and potassium (beside carbon, oxygen and nitrogen), while a different element composition is found in the two related species A. richardsae and A. tasmaniensis. Evidence for lipids, carbohydrates and proteins was negative on the histochemical level, however X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirm the presence of peptides within the droplet content. Different to earlier assumptions, the present study indicates that rather than oxalic acid, urea or uric acid are present in the adhesive droplets, presumably originating from the gut. Comparing the capture system in Arachnocampa with those of orb-spiders, large differences appear not only regarding the silky threads, but also, in the composition, hygroscopic properties and size of the mucous droplets.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAnimalsAustraliaBehavior, AnimalCarbonDipteraEnvironmentGlycoproteinsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNew ZealandNitrogenOxygenPotassiumPredatory BehaviorSilkSodiumAdhesivesCarbonGlycoproteinsNitrogenOxygenPotassiumSilkSodiumSulfur

Identifiers

PMID27973586
PMCPMC5156358
OpenAlexW2564708971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.