Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27973572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Zoonotic Cryptosporidium Species in Animals Inhabiting Sydney Water Catchments.

Alireza Zahedi, Paul Monis, Sarah Aucote, Brendon King, Andrea Paparini, Fuchun Jian, Rongchang Yang, Charlotte Oskam, Andrew Ball, Ian Robertson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Large-scale molecular epidemiological survey ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Advancing genomics for waterborne pathogen surveillance in Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Waterborne protozoan and microsporidian parasites in Eurasian beavers (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  8. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Genetic diversity ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Molecular Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. An Update on ZoonoticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The prevalence and genetic characterisation ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  19. Genetic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Diverse Genotypes and Species ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alireza ZahediVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Paul MonisAustralian Water Quality Centre, South Australian Water Corporation, Adelaide, Australia.
Sarah AucoteSchool of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Brendon KingAustralian Water Quality Centre, South Australian Water Corporation, Adelaide, Australia.
Andrea PapariniVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Fuchun JianHenan Agricultural University, Henan, China.
Rongchang YangVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Charlotte OskamVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Andrew BallWaterNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Ian RobertsonVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Una RyanVector and Waterborne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Murdoch University · AUFlinders University · AUAustralian Water Quality Centre · AUHenan Agricultural University · CNWaterNSW · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptosporidium is one of the most common zoonotic waterborne parasitic diseases worldwide and represents a major public health concern of water utilities in developed nations. As animals in catchments can shed human-infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts, determining the potential role of animals in dissemination of zoonotic Cryptosporidium to drinking water sources is crucial. In the present study, a total of 952 animal faecal samples from four dominant species (kangaroos, rabbits, cattle and sheep) inhabiting Sydney's drinking water catchments were screened for the presence of Cryptosporidium using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) and positives sequenced at multiple loci. Cryptosporidium species were detected in 3.6% (21/576) of kangaroos, 7.0% (10/142) of cattle, 2.3% (3/128) of sheep and 13.2% (14/106) of rabbit samples screened. Sequence analysis of a region of the 18S rRNA locus identified C. macropodum and C. hominis in 4 and 17 isolates from kangaroos respectively, C. hominis and C. parvum in 6 and 4 isolates respectively each from cattle, C. ubiquitum in 3 isolates from sheep and C. cuniculus in 14 isolates from rabbits. All the Cryptosporidium species identified were zoonotic species with the exception of C. macropodum. Subtyping using the 5' half of gp60 identified C. hominis IbA10G2 (n = 12) and IdA15G1 (n = 2) in kangaroo faecal samples; C. hominis IbA10G2 (n = 4) and C. parvum IIaA18G3R1 (n = 4) in cattle faecal samples, C. ubiquitum subtype XIIa (n = 1) in sheep and C. cuniculus VbA23 (n = 9) in rabbits. Additional analysis of a subset of samples using primers targeting conserved regions of the MIC1 gene and the 3' end of gp60 suggests that the C. hominis detected in these animals represent substantial variants that failed to amplify as expected. The significance of this finding requires further investigation but might be reflective of the ability of this C. hominis variant to infect animals. The finding of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in these animals may have important implications for the management of drinking water catchments to minimize risk to public health.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDNA, ProtozoanFecesHumansMacropodidaeMicroscopyNew South WalesOocystsPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRabbitsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SDNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18SWaterWater Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID27973572
PMCPMC5156390
OpenAlexW2565393472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.