ArticlePloS one2016
Intradermal Delivery of Antigens Enhances Specific IgG and Diminishes IgE Production: Potential Use for Vaccination and Allergy Immunotherapy.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for the Management of Melasma: A Split-Face, Randomized Control Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Intradermal Phleum pratense allergoid immunotherapy. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Trial
- Injectable Aesthetic Treatments for Improving Facial Skin Quality in Transgender Patients With or Without Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Critical analysis of translational potential of rodent models of white matter pathology across a wide spectrum of human diseases.Cell death & disease · 2025Review
- Article
- Intradermal Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Current Evidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Targeted allergen-specific immunotherapy within the skin improves allergen delivery to induce desensitization to peanut.Immunotherapy · 2022Article
- Immunology of allergen immunotherapy.Immunotherapy advances · 2022Review
- A Microbiota-Dependent Subset of Skin Macrophages Protects Against Cutaneous Bacterial Infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- The Role of Regulatory T Cells in Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Food Allergy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Innovative Systems to Deliver Allergen Powder for Epicutaneous Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Free Feeding of CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotide Particles Prophylactically Attenuates Allergic Airway Inflammation and Hyperresponsiveness in Mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Intradermal Delivery of Dendritic Cell-Targeting Chimeric mAbs Genetically Fused to Type 2 Dengue Virus Nonstructural Protein 1.Vaccines · 2020Article
- Delivery of allergen powder for safe and effective epicutaneous immunotherapy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Article
- Article
- Skin as an immune organ and clinical applications of skin-based immunotherapy.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin is protected by a tough but flexible multilayered barrier and is a front line for immune responses against invading particles. For many years now, skin has been a tissue where certain vaccines are injected for the prevention of infectious disease, however, the detailed mechanisms of the skin immune response are not yet well understood. Using thin and small injection needles, we carefully injected OVA into a restricted region of mouse skin, i.e., intradermal (ID), and examined the antibody response in comparison with subcutaneous (SC) injection or epicutaneous patch administration of OVA. Epicutaneous patches induced a high IgE response against OVA, but IgG production was low. High IgG production was induced by both ID and SC injection, moreover, ID injection induced higher IgG production without any adjutants. Furthermore, OVA-specific IgE production was diminished by ID injection. We found that ID injection could efficiently stimulate skin resident DCs, drive Th1-biased conditions and diminish IgE production. The ID injection response was regulated by Langerin+ dermal DCs, because OVA was taken up mainly by these cells and, after transiently deleting them, the IgE response was no longer diminished and IgG1 production was enhanced. We also tested whether ID injection might be an effective allergy treatment by attempting to inhibit ongoing IgE production in mice with experimentally induced high serum IgE levels. Multiple ID injections of OVA were shown to prevent elevation of serum OVA-specific IgE after repeated allergen challenge. In contrast, SC OVA injection could only transiently inhibit the OVA-specific IgE production. These findings indicated that ID injection results in higher induction of antigen-specific IgG, and thus may be useful for vaccine delivery with little or no adjuvant components. Moreover, the observed diminishment of IgE and induction of Th1-biased immune responses suggest that ID may be a useful injection route for allergy immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.