Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27973543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Intradermal Delivery of Antigens Enhances Specific IgG and Diminishes IgE Production: Potential Use for Vaccination and Allergy Immunotherapy.

Takuwa Yasuda, Takehiro Ura, Masaru Taniguchi, Hisahiro Yoshida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Intradermal Phleum pratense allergoid immunotherapy. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Immunology of allergen immunotherapy.Immunotherapy advances · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Delivery of allergen powder for safe and effective epicutaneous immunotherapy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takuwa YasudaLaboratory for Immunogenetics, RIKEN Research Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS), Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takehiro UraHospital Company R&D Department, Terumo Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masaru TaniguchiLaboratory for Immune Regulation, RIKEN Research Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS), Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hisahiro YoshidaLaboratory for Immunogenetics, RIKEN Research Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS), Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPTerumo (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin is protected by a tough but flexible multilayered barrier and is a front line for immune responses against invading particles. For many years now, skin has been a tissue where certain vaccines are injected for the prevention of infectious disease, however, the detailed mechanisms of the skin immune response are not yet well understood. Using thin and small injection needles, we carefully injected OVA into a restricted region of mouse skin, i.e., intradermal (ID), and examined the antibody response in comparison with subcutaneous (SC) injection or epicutaneous patch administration of OVA. Epicutaneous patches induced a high IgE response against OVA, but IgG production was low. High IgG production was induced by both ID and SC injection, moreover, ID injection induced higher IgG production without any adjutants. Furthermore, OVA-specific IgE production was diminished by ID injection. We found that ID injection could efficiently stimulate skin resident DCs, drive Th1-biased conditions and diminish IgE production. The ID injection response was regulated by Langerin+ dermal DCs, because OVA was taken up mainly by these cells and, after transiently deleting them, the IgE response was no longer diminished and IgG1 production was enhanced. We also tested whether ID injection might be an effective allergy treatment by attempting to inhibit ongoing IgE production in mice with experimentally induced high serum IgE levels. Multiple ID injections of OVA were shown to prevent elevation of serum OVA-specific IgE after repeated allergen challenge. In contrast, SC OVA injection could only transiently inhibit the OVA-specific IgE production. These findings indicated that ID injection results in higher induction of antigen-specific IgG, and thus may be useful for vaccine delivery with little or no adjuvant components. Moreover, the observed diminishment of IgE and induction of Th1-biased immune responses suggest that ID may be a useful injection route for allergy immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsDendritic CellsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyInjections, IntradermalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLOvalbuminSkinAllergensImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GOvalbuminVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27973543
PMCPMC5156430
OpenAlexW2562184332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.