Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27973444›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Differential Cytotoxic Potential of Silver Nanoparticles in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells and Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells.

Yun-Jung Choi, Jung-Hyun Park, Jae Woong Han, Eunsu Kim, Oh Jae-Wook, Seung Yoon Lee, Jin-Hoi Kim, Sangiliyandi Gurunathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancer stem cells and strategies for targeted drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yun-Jung ChoiDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. yunjungc@konkuk.ac.kr.
Jung-Hyun ParkDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. saladinhyun@naver.com.
Jae Woong HanDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. woong1211@naver.com.
Eunsu KimDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. np-gennao@hanmail.net.
Oh Jae-WookDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. ohjw62@gmail.com.
Seung Yoon LeeSwine Consulting Group, HanByol Farm Tech, Gyeonggi 463-785, Korea. kissleevet@gmail.com.
Jin-Hoi KimDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. jhkim541@konkuk.ac.kr.
Sangiliyandi GurunathanDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. sangiliyandi@konkuk.ac.kr.
Konkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis postulates that cancer cells are composed of hierarchically-organized subpopulations of cells with distinct phenotypes and tumorigenic capacities. As a result, CSCs have been suggested as a source of disease recurrence. Recently, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been used as antimicrobial, disinfectant, and antitumor agents. However, there is no study reporting the effects of AgNPs on ovarian cancer stem cells (OvCSCs). In this study, we investigated the cytotoxic effects of AgNPs and their mechanism of causing cell death in A2780 (human ovarian cancer cells) and OvCSCs derived from A2780. In order to examine these effects, OvCSCs were isolated and characterized using positive CSC markers including aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and CD133 by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The anticancer properties of the AgNPs were evaluated by assessing cell viability, leakage of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial membrane potential (mt-MP). The inhibitory effect of AgNPs on the growth of ovarian cancer cells and OvCSCs was evaluated using a clonogenic assay. Following 1-2 weeks of incubation with the AgNPs, the numbers of A2780 (bulk cells) and ALDH⁺/CD133⁺ colonies were significantly reduced. The expression of apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Our observations showed that treatment with AgNPs resulted in severe cytotoxicity in both ovarian cancer cells and OvCSCs. In particular, AgNPs showed significant cytotoxic potential in ALDH⁺/CD133⁺ subpopulations of cells compared with other subpopulation of cells and also human ovarian cancer cells (bulk cells). These findings suggest that AgNPs can be utilized in the development of novel nanotherapeutic molecules for the treatment of ovarian cancers by specific targeting of the ALDH⁺/CD133⁺ subpopulation of cells.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAldehyde DehydrogenaseCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell SeparationCell SurvivalFemaleHumansMetal NanoparticlesNeoplastic Stem CellsOvarian NeoplasmsSilverTime FactorsTumor Stem Cell AssayAC133 AntigenAldehyde DehydrogenaseSilvercancer therapycell viabilitycytotoxicityovarian cancer cellsovarian cancer stem cellssilver nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID27973444
PMCPMC5187877
OpenAlexW2562352619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.