Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27973380›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2016

Reference data for jumping mechanography in Canadian children, adolescents and young adults.

L Gabel, H M Macdonald, L Nettlefold, D Race, H A McKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Jumping mechanography reference data in Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 20 years.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Experience with jumping mechanography in children with cerebral palsy.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2017
    Article
  8. Muscle power in children, youth and young adults who acquired HIV perinatally.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L GabelDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
H M Macdonald
L Nettlefold
D Race
H A McKay
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-84575CIHR OBM- 101391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide age- and sex-specific reference data for mechanography-derived parameters of muscle function in Canadian children and youth using the single two-legged jump (S2LJ) with hands-on-waist.

methodsOur sample included 2017 observations from 715 participants (9-21 years; 338 girls). Participants performed three S2LJ with hands-on-waist on a force platform (Leonardo Mechanograph, Novotec). Outcomes were maximum peak power (P

resultsWith the exception of Efficiency, mechanography outcomes were greater in girls (4-40%, p<0.05) than boys at age 9. Boys' advantage in mechanography parameters emerged in adolescence (age 11-13 years; 3-65%, p<0.05) and persisted into young adulthood, except for F

conclusionsWe provide the first reference data for the S2LJ using the hands-on-waist protocol in children, youth and young adults. These data support previous findings using freely moving arms and can be used when evaluating muscle function in pediatric studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentCanadaChildExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalReference ValuesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27973380
PMCPMC5259569
OpenAlexW2580683210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.