Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27966653›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

The accessory proteins REEP5 and REEP6 refine CXCR1-mediated cellular responses and lung cancer progression.

Cho Rong Park, Dong-Joo You, Sumi Park, Sunam Mander, Da-Eun Jang, Su-Cheong Yeom, Seong-Hyun Oh, Curie Ahn, Sang Heon Lee, Jae Young Seong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cho Rong ParkGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Joo YouGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sumi ParkGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sunam ManderGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Da-Eun JangGraduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-Ro, Daewha, Pyeongchang, Kangwon, 25354, Republic of Korea.
Su-Cheong YeomGraduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-Ro, Daewha, Pyeongchang, Kangwon, 25354, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Hyun OhCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon, 406-840, Republic of Korea.
Curie AhnTransplantation Research Institute, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Yongun-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Republic of Korea.
Sang Heon LeeDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jae Young SeongGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Ik HwangGraduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KRSeoul National University · KRGachon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some G-protein-coupled receptors have been reported to require accessory proteins with specificity for proper functional expression. In this study, we found that CXCR1 interacted with REEP5 and REEP6, but CXCR2 did not. Overexpression of REEP5 and REEP6 enhanced IL-8-stimulated cellular responses through CXCR1, whereas depletion of the proteins led to the downregulation of the responses. Although REEPs enhanced the expression of a subset of GPCRs, in the absence of REEP5 and REEP6, CXCR1 was expressed in the plasma membrane, but receptor internalization and intracellular clustering of β-arrestin2 following IL-8 treatment were impaired, suggesting that REEP5 and REEP6 might be involved in the ligand-stimulated endocytosis of CXCR1 rather than membrane expression, which resulted in strong cellular responses. In A549 lung cancer cells, which endogenously express CXCR1, the depletion of REEP5 and REEP6 significantly reduced growth and invasion by downregulating IL-8-stimulated ERK phosphorylation, actin polymerization and the expression of genes related to metastasis. Furthermore, an in vivo xenograft model showed that proliferation and metastasis of A549 cells lacking REEP5 and REEP6 were markedly decreased compared to the control group. Thus, REEP5 and REEP6 could be novel regulators of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling whose functional mechanisms differ from other accessory proteins.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsDisease ProgressionEye ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHEK293 CellsHumansInterleukin-8Lung NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDProtein BindingReceptors, Interleukin-8ARNA InterferenceEye ProteinsInterleukin-8Membrane ProteinsReceptors, Interleukin-8AREEP5 protein, humanREEP6 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27966653
PMCPMC5155276
OpenAlexW2565895938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.