Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27966532›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Integrative modelling of tumour DNA methylation quantifies the contribution of metabolism.

Mahya Mehrmohamadi, Lucas K Mentch, Andrew G Clark, Jason W Locasale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The regulation mechanisms and the Lamarckian inheritance property of DNA methylation in animals.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Tumour Metabolism in Cisplatin Resistance.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Silencing NID2 by DNA Hypermethylation Promotes Lung Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahya MehrmohamadiDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6681-0810
Lucas K MentchDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Field of Genetics, Genomics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Jason W LocasaleDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

Funding

Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
Understanding metabolic flux and the control of mammalian cell growthR00CA168997 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LOCASALE, JASON W. · 2013 to 2015
$695k
Characterization of the functions of one-carbon metabolism across human cancersK00CA212457 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEHRMOHAMADI, MAHYA · 2017 to 2019
$228k
Characterization of the functions of one-carbon metabolism across human cancersF99CA212457 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI MEHRMOHAMADI, MAHYA · 2016 to 2016
$32k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA212457NCI NIH HHS K00 CA212457NCI NIH HHS R00 CA168997NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered DNA methylation is common in cancer and often considered an early event in tumorigenesis. However, the sources of heterogeneity of DNA methylation among tumours remain poorly defined. Here we capitalize on the availability of multi-platform data on thousands of human tumours to build integrative models of DNA methylation. We quantify the contribution of clinical and molecular factors in explaining intertumoral variability in DNA methylation. We show that the levels of a set of metabolic genes involved in the methionine cycle is predictive of several features of DNA methylation in tumours, including the methylation of cancer genes. Finally, we demonstrate that patients whose DNA methylation can be predicted from the methionine cycle exhibited improved survival over cases where this regulation is disrupted. This study represents a comprehensive analysis of the determinants of methylation and demonstrates the surprisingly large interaction between metabolism and DNA methylation variation. Together, our results quantify links between tumour metabolism and epigenetics and outline clinical implications.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationModels, BiologicalEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27966532
PMCPMC5171841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.