Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27966347›Full record

ArticleChemical reviews2017

Stimulated Raman Scattering: From Bulk to Nano.

Richard C Prince, Renee R Frontiera, Eric O Potma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Principle of Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy: Emerging at High Spatiotemporal Limits.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  20. Real-Time Tracking of Photoinduced Metal-Metal Bond Formation in a dJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard C PrinceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine , 1436 Natural Sciences II, Irvine, California 92697-2025, United States.
Renee R FrontieraDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis , B-18, 139 Smith Hall, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, United States.
Eric O PotmaDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine , 1107 Natural Sciences II, Irvine, California 92697-2025, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6131

Funding

WOUND MIGRATION FORCE MONITORINGP41RR001192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CHOI, BERNARD · 1985 to 2011
$14.2M
Virtual Photonocs TechnologiesP41EB015890 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TROMBERG, BRUCE J. · 2012 to 2017
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001192NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) describes a family of techniques first discovered and developed in the 1960s. Whereas the nascent history of the technique is parallel to that of laser light sources, recent advances have spurred a resurgence in its use and development that has spanned across scientific fields and spatial scales. SRS is a nonlinear technique that probes the same vibrational modes of molecules that are seen in spontaneous Raman scattering. While spontaneous Raman scattering is an incoherent technique, SRS is a coherent process, and this fact provides several advantages over conventional Raman techniques, among which are much stronger signals and the ability to time-resolve the vibrational motions. Technological improvements in pulse generation and detection strategies have allowed SRS to probe increasingly smaller volumes and shorter time scales. This has enabled SRS research to move from its original domain, of probing bulk media, to imaging biological tissues and single cells at the micro scale, and, ultimately, to characterizing samples with subdiffraction resolution at the nanoscale. In this Review, we give an overview of the history of the technique, outline its basic properties, and present historical and current uses at multiple length scales to underline the utility of SRS to the molecular sciences.

Identifiers

PMID27966347
PMCPMC5471143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.