Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27966247›Full record

ReviewHemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis2017

Can twice weekly hemodialysis expand patient access under resource constraints?

Dipal Savla, Glenn M Chertow, Timothy Meyer, Shuchi Anand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Twice-Weekly Hemodialysis Is an Option for Many Patients in Times of Dialysis Unit Stress.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dipal SavlaStudent Affairs, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Timothy MeyerDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Shuchi AnandDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Mentoring Patient-Oriented Clinical Investigators in NephrologyK24DK085446 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 2010 to 2022
$1.4M
Epidemiology and management of chronic kidney disease in South AsiansK23DK101826 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SHUCHI · 2014 to 2018
$919k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK101826NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK085446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convention of prescribing hemodialysis on a thrice weekly schedule began empirically when it seemed that this frequency was convenient and likely to treat symptoms for a majority of patients. Later, when urea was identified as the main target and marker of clearance, studies supported the prevailing notion that thrice weekly dialysis provided appropriate clearance of urea. Today, national guidelines on hemodialysis from most countries recommend patients receive at least thrice weekly therapy. However, resource constraints in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have resulted in a substantial proportion of patients using less frequent hemodialysis in these settings. Observational studies of patients on twice weekly dialysis show that twice weekly therapy has noninferior survival rates compared with thrice weekly therapy. In fact, models of urea clearance also show that twice weekly therapy can meet urea clearance "targets" if patients have significant residual function or if they follow a protein-restricted diet, as may be common in LMIC. Greater reliance on twice weekly therapy, at least at the start of hemodialysis, therefore has potential to reduce health care costs and increase access to renal replacement therapy in low-resource settings; however, randomized control trials are needed to better understand long-term outcomes of twice versus thrice weekly therapy.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth Care CostsHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleRenal DialysisSurvival Analysisfrequency of hemodialysishealth care costslow- and middle-income countriesRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID27966247
PMCPMC5545171
OpenAlexW2566951551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.