Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965884›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2016

Investigating the differential impact of school and community-based integrated control programmes for soil-transmitted helminths in Timor-Leste: the (S)WASH-D for Worms pilot study protocol.

Naomi E Clarke, Archie C A Clements, Stuart Bryan, John McGown, Darren Gray, Susana V Nery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk profiling and efficacy of albendazole against the hookwormsThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Soil-Transmitted Helminths in Tropical Australia and Asia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi E ClarkeResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-8185
Archie C A ClementsResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Stuart BryanCruz Vermelha Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste.
John McGownPlan International Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste.
Darren GrayResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Susana V NeryResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Australian National University · AUUniversidade da Paz · TL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWater, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions represent an important component of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection control, alongside the administration of anthelmintic drugs, which are generally targeted to school-aged children. Recent modelling studies have suggested that STH control programmes should be broadened to include all age groups across the community. We describe the protocol for a pilot study investigating the impact of school-versus-community-based delivery of integrated WASH and deworming programmes on STH infections in school-aged children in Timor-Leste.

methodsThe (S)WASH-D for Worms pilot is a two-arm, non-randomised cluster intervention study. The aims are to determine feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures and to establish proof of principle for the hypothesis that STH control programmes directed to the entire community will lead to greater reductions in STH infections in children than programmes directed only to school-aged children. Of the six participating communities, three receive a school-based integrated WASH and deworming programme and three additionally receive a community-based integrated WASH and deworming programme. The primary outcomes are the proportions of eligible children who enrol in the study and participate in the data collection, and outcomes relating to WASH and deworming programme completion, coverage, and use. Secondary outcomes are the cumulative incidence and mean intensity of STH infection in school-aged children at 6-month follow-up, mean haemoglobin concentration and several anthropometric indices. Results will inform the design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT). DISCUSSION: This pilot study is being conducted in preparation for a cluster-RCT investigating the differential impact of school- and community-based integrated STH control programmes on STH infections in school-aged children. It aims to establish feasibility and proof of principle, while results of the subsequent RCT could have significant implications for global STH control policy.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615001012561.

Indexed as

Mass drug administrationSanitation and hygieneSoil-transmitted helminthsWater

Identifiers

PMID27965884
PMCPMC5154107
OpenAlexW2552046217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.