Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965857›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2016

Culturally-adapted Family Intervention (CaFI) for African-Caribbeans diagnosed with schizophrenia and their families: a feasibility study protocol of implementation and acceptability.

Dawn Edge, Amy Degnan, Sarah Cotterill, Katherine Berry, Richard Drake, John Baker, Christine Barrowclough, Adwoa Hughes-Morley, Paul Grey, Dinesh Bhugra and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn EdgeCentre for Women's Mental Health, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, G6 Coupland Building, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Amy DegnanCentre for Women's Mental Health, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Third Floor Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK.
Sarah CotterillCentre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katherine BerrySchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Second Floor Zochonis Building, Manchester, UK.
Richard DrakeInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Third Floor Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK ; Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust, 70 Manchester Rd, Manchester, M21 9UN UK.
John BakerFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Christine BarrowcloughSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Second Floor Zochonis Building, Manchester, UK.
Adwoa Hughes-MorleyMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, UK ; York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Paul GreyInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Third Floor Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK.
Dinesh BhugraInstitute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, WC2R 2LS UK.
Patrick CahoonManchester Mental Health and Social Care NHS Trust, Chorlton House, Chorlton, Manchester, UK.
Nicholas TarrierInstitute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, WC2R 2LS UK.
Shôn LewisInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Third Floor Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK.
Kathryn AbelCentre for Women's Mental Health, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Third Floor Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK ; Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust, 70 Manchester Rd, Manchester, M21 9UN UK.
University of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/5001/62Department of Health DRF-2012-05-128Medical Research Council G1002325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican-Caribbeans in the UK have the highest schizophrenia incidence and greatest inequity in access to mental health services of all ethnic groups. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) highlights this crisis in care and urgent need to improve evidence-based mental healthcare, experiences of services and outcomes for this group. Family intervention (FI) is clinically and cost-effective for the management of schizophrenia but it is rarely offered. Evidence for FI with minority ethnic groups generally, and African-Caribbeans in particular, is lacking. This study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of delivering Culturally-adapted Family Intervention (CaFI) to African-Caribbean service users diagnosed with schizophrenia. METHODS/

designThis is a feasibility cohort design study. Over a 12-month intervention period, 30 service users and their families, recruited from hospital and community settings, will receive ten one-hourly sessions of CaFI. Where biological families are absent, access to the intervention will be optimised through 'family support members'; trusted individuals nominated by service users or study volunteers. We shall collect data on eligibility, uptake, retention and attrition and assess the utility and feasibility of collecting various outcome measures including readmission, service engagement, working alliance, clinical symptoms and functioning, perceived criticism, psychosis knowledge, familial stress and economic costs. Measures will be collected at baseline, post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up using validated questionnaires and standardised interviews. Admission rates and change in care management will be rated by independent case note examination. Variability in the measures will inform sample size estimates for a future trial. Independent raters will assess fidelity to the intervention in 10 % of sessions. Feedback at the end of each session along with thematically-analysed qualitative interviews will examine CaFI's acceptability to service users, families and healthcare professionals. DISCUSSION: This innovative response to inequalities in mental healthcare experienced by African-Caribbeans diagnosed with schizophrenia might improve engagement in services, access to evidence-based interventions and clinical outcomes. Successful implementation of CaFI in this group could pave the way for better engagement and provision across marginalised groups and therefore has potentially important implications for commissioning and service delivery in ethnically diverse populations. This study will demonstrate whether the approach is feasible and acceptable and can be implemented with fidelity in different settings.

Indexed as

African-CaribbeanBlack and minority ethnic (BME)Black BritishCultural adaptationFamily interventionFeasibility trialPsychological therapyPsychosisSchizophreniaSevere mental illness (SMI)

Identifiers

PMID27965857
PMCPMC5154101
OpenAlexW2487930785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.