Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965816›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2015

Exploring the feasibility and synergistic value of the One Health approach in clinical research: protocol for a prospective observational study of diagnostic pathways in human and canine patients with suspected urinary tract infection.

Gloria Cordoba, Tina Møller Sørensen, Anne Holm, Charlotte Reinhard Bjørnvad, Lars Bjerrum, Lisbeth Rem Jessen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02249273 (Diagnostic Process in Patients With a Suspected Urinary Trcat Infection in Danish Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02249273 completednot on this map

Diagnostic Process in Patients With a Suspected Urinary Trcat Infection in Danish Primary Care: Impact on Appropriate Use of Antibiotics and Patient's Recovery.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled500ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionsArmsDiagnostic approaches
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gloria CordobaDepartment of Public Health, The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P. O. Box 2099, DK-1440 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Tina Møller SørensenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical & Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne HolmDepartment of Public Health, The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P. O. Box 2099, DK-1440 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Charlotte Reinhard BjørnvadDepartment of Veterinary Clinical & Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars BjerrumDepartment of Public Health, The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P. O. Box 2099, DK-1440 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Lisbeth Rem JessenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical & Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe One Health approach is emerging in response to the development of bacterial resistance. To the best of our knowledge, the possibility to use this approach in a clinical context has not yet been explored. Thus, in this paper, we report the procedures to implement a prospective observational study of diagnostic pathways in human and canine patients with suspected urinary tract infection as a means to assess the feasibility and synergistic value of setting up One Health clinical research projects and interventions. METHODS/

designA prospective observational study will compare different diagnostic pathways (i.e., 16 possible combinations of diagnostic tools) to gold standard in human and veterinary primary care practice in Denmark. Fifty primary care practices and 100 veterinary clinics will each consecutively include 20 human patients or 8-10 dogs, respectively. Data will be collected at practice and patient level comprising (a) information about the organization of the practice and access to different diagnostic tools, (b) information about clinical history, diagnostic path and treatment during the index consultation, (c) information about severity of symptoms during the 7-10 days following inclusion, and (d) urine culture (type of microorganism and susceptibility test). The feasibility and synergistic value of conducting future research, and/or designing common interventions, will be assessed by evaluating the comparability of human primary care and veterinary primary care with respect to study implementation and study results. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will give an insight into the feasibility and synergistic value of setting-up One Health research projects in a clinical context. This is crucial if we are to embrace the One Health approach, as a legitimate strategy to implement common interventions aimed at influencing the diagnostic process in human and canine patients in order to decrease inappropriate use of antibiotics.

trial registrationThe study in humans has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02249273.

Indexed as

DysuriaMicrobiologyPoint-of-care systems

Identifiers

PMID27965816
PMCPMC5154006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.