ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2015
The person-based approach to enhancing the acceptability and feasibility of interventions.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
208 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 376 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pain science education and exercise interventions for people with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review, content and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping characteristics of mental skills training interventions in dance using TIDieR: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Parents' experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Pooled it
- The effectiveness of interventions to reduce the transmission of acute respiratory infections in care homes: a systematic review.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Pooled it
- Supporting families managing childhood eczema: developing and optimising eczema care online using qualitative research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Self-Guided Digital Interventions to Improve Physical Activity and Exercise Outcomes for People With Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Identifying effective characteristics of behavioral weight management interventions for people with serious mental illness: A systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022Pooled it
- Digital Interventions on Healthy Lifestyle Management: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Pooled it
- The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers for Increasing Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Self-management for chronic widespread pain including fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intervention planning for a digital intervention for self-management of hypertension: a theory-, evidence- and person-based approach.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Children's Communication Choices About Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury: Insights From a Public Involvement Event.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Influence of the intelligent knee osteoarthritis lifestyle app (iKOALA) on knee joint pain.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Trial
- A tailored psychological intervention for anxiety and depression management in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: TANDEM RCT and process evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Trial
148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper provides three illustrations of how the "person-based approach" can be used to assess and enhance the acceptability and feasibility of an intervention during the early stages of development and evaluation. The person-based approach involves using mixed methods research to systematically investigate the beliefs, attitudes, needs and situation of the people who will be using the intervention. The in-depth understanding of users' perspectives derived from this research then enables intervention developers to design or modify the intervention to make it more relevant, persuasive, accessible and engaging.
methodsThe first illustration describes how relevant beliefs and attitudes of people with asthma were identified from the existing qualitative and quantitative literature and then used to create
resultsIn the first illustration of the person-based approach, we present the guiding principles we developed to summarise
conclusionsThe person-based approach to intervention development can complement theory- and evidence-based development and participant input into intervention design, offering a systematic process for systematically investigating and incorporating the views of a wide range of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.