Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965810›Full record

ReviewPilot and feasibility studies2015

Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers.

Alicia O'Cathain, Pat Hoddinott, Simon Lewin, Kate J Thomas, Bridget Young, Joy Adamson, Yvonne Jfm Jansen, Nicola Mills, Graham Moore, Jenny L Donovan

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 266 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
266citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06254105 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Cross-sectorial Management Program in Hand Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorParker Research InstituteRan2024 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsHand OsteoarthritisArmsHANDY programme
NCT06412341 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility Study to Inform an RCT to Evaluate 'Accepting Your Body After Cancer', an Online-delivered, Group-based CBT Body Image Intervention, for Women Who Have Received Treatment for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the West of EnglandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsAccepting your Body after Cancer, Macmillan body image booklet
NCT06575764 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Heart Priority Programme for Patients at Risk of Dropout From Cardiac Rehabilitation - a Development- and Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDefactum, Central Denmark RegionRan2023 to 2025Enrolled260ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsThe Heart Priority Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

266 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Clinical pharmacist interventions on pain management in cancer patients (PharmaCAP) in low resource settings: a multicenter feasibility-pilot randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

206 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alicia O'CathainMedical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
Pat HoddinottPrimary Care, Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Scotland UK.
Simon LewinGlobal Health Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway ; Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kate J ThomasMedical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
Bridget YoungInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK.
Joy AdamsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Yvonne Jfm JansenBehavioural and Societal Sciences, Work, Health & Care, Schoemakerstraat 97 (Gebouw A), Delft, 2628 VK Netherlands.
Nicola MillsSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK.
Graham MooreCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3XQ UK.
Jenny L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feasibility studies are increasingly undertaken in preparation for randomised controlled trials in order to explore uncertainties and enable trialists to optimise the intervention or the conduct of the trial. Qualitative research can be used to examine and address key uncertainties prior to a full trial. We present guidance that researchers, research funders and reviewers may wish to consider when assessing or undertaking qualitative research within feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials. The guidance consists of 16 items within five domains: research questions, data collection, analysis, teamwork and reporting. Appropriate and well conducted qualitative research can make an important contribution to feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials. This guidance may help researchers to consider the full range of contributions that qualitative research can make in relation to their particular trial. The guidance may also help researchers and others to reflect on the utility of such qualitative research in practice, so that trial teams can decide when and how best to use these approaches in future studies.

Indexed as

Feasibility studiesGuidancePilot studiesQualitative methodsRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27965810
PMCPMC5154038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.