Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965805›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2015

A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the addition of direct access to physiotherapy to usual GP-led primary care for adults with musculoskeletal pain: the STEMS pilot trial protocol (ISRCTN23378642).

Annette Bishop, Stephanie Tooth, Joanne Protheroe, Chris Salisbury, Reuben O Ogollah, Sue Jowett, Elaine M Hay, Nadine E Foster, STEMS study team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annette BishopResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
Stephanie ToothResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
Joanne ProtheroeResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Reuben O OgollahResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elaine M HayResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
Nadine E FosterResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK.
STEMS study team
Keele University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal problems are common, accounting for up to 30 % of general practitioner (GP) consultations and are a major cause of chronic disability worldwide. Demand for health care for musculoskeletal conditions is likely to continue to rise given the ageing population and the increasing impact of these common painful conditions. Physiotherapists are well equipped to deliver evidence-based management for these conditions. Direct access allows patients to access physiotherapy without seeing their GP or another referring practitioner first; however, for most patients in the UK, access to National Health Service physiotherapy is controlled through GP referral. METHODS/

designThe aim of this pilot, pragmatic, cluster trial is to assess the feasibility of a future large trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the additional offer of direct access to physiotherapy versus continuing with usual GP-led primary care alone for adults with common musculoskeletal problems. The pilot will focus on process outcomes to assess feasibility, although performance of the likely outcomes of a main trial will also be assessed. This is a two-arm parallel, cluster RCT where GP practices are the units of randomisation (the clusters), yet data are collected from individual patients with musculoskeletal problems (the participants). A direct access service will be set up in the participating physiotherapy service to provide the option of direct access to patients of the intervention arm practices. Inclusion criteria are broad to reflect the 'real-world' operation of an NHS physiotherapy direct access service for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Data collection will be through patient self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months and medical record review. DISCUSSION: No previous trials have been conducted into direct access to physiotherapy for patients with musculoskeletal problems. The strengths of the STEMS pilot trial are its size, the length of follow-up, and collection of process, clinical and cost outcomes to fully inform a future main trial to meet calls to provide robust trial evidence of the impact on clinical outcomes, work loss and costs to provide clinicians and service funders with the high quality trial data they need to guide decisions on the best models of care.

trial registrationThe STEMS pilot trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN23378642.

Indexed as

Cluster trialDirect accessMusculoskeletalPhysiotherapyPilotSelf-referral

Identifiers

PMID27965805
PMCPMC5154068
OpenAlexW1831372613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.