Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965800›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2015

Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the use of traffic light food labelling in UK shoppers (the FLICC trial).

Peter Scarborough, Charo Hodgkins, Monique M Raats, Richard A Harrington, Gill Cowburn, Moira Dean, Aiden Doherty, Charlie Foster, Edmund Juszczak, Anne Matthews and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding and acceptability by Hispanic consumers of four front-of-pack food labels.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peter ScarboroughNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charo HodgkinsFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Monique M RaatsFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Richard A HarringtonNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gill CowburnNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Moira DeanSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Aiden DohertyNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charlie FosterNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Edmund JuszczakNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anne MatthewsNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anja MizdrakNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cliona Ni MhurchuNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard ShepherdFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Lada TiomotijevicFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Naomi WinstoneFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Mike RaynerNuffield Department of Population Health, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraffic light labelling of foods-a system that incorporates a colour-coded assessment of the level of total fat, saturated fat, sugar and salt on the front of packaged foods-has been recommended by the UK Government and is currently in use or being phased in by many UK manufacturers and retailers. This paper describes a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention designed to increase the use of traffic light labelling during real-life food purchase decisions. METHODS/

designThe objectives of this two-arm randomised controlled pilot trial are to assess recruitment, retention and data completion rates, to generate potential effect size estimates to inform sample size calculations for the main trial and to assess the feasibility of conducting such a trial. Participants will be recruited by email from a loyalty card database of a UK supermarket chain. Eligible participants will be over 18 and regular shoppers who frequently purchase ready meals or pizzas. The intervention is informed by a review of previous interventions encouraging the use of nutrition labelling and the broader behaviour change literature. It is designed to impact on mechanisms affecting belief and behavioural intention formation as well as those associated with planning and goal setting and the adoption and maintenance of the behaviour of interest, namely traffic light label use during purchases of ready meals and pizzas. Data will be collected using electronic sales data via supermarket loyalty cards and web-based questionnaires and will be used to estimate the effect of the intervention on the nutrition profile of purchased ready meals and pizzas and the behavioural mechanisms associated with label use. Data collection will take place over 48 weeks. A process evaluation including semi-structured interviews and web analytics will be conducted to assess feasibility of a full trial. DISCUSSION: The design of the pilot trial allows for efficient recruitment and data collection. The intervention could be generalised to a wider population if shown to be feasible in the main trial.

trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN19316955.

Indexed as

FoodNutritionNutrition labellingTraffic light labellingTrial

Identifiers

PMID27965800
PMCPMC5153808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.