Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965788›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2015

A randomised controlled feasibility trial of family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs: study protocol (Y-SBNT).

Judith Watson, Donna Back, Paul Toner, Charlie Lloyd, Ed Day, Louca-Mai Brady, Lorna Templeton, Sangeeta Ambegaokar, Steve Parrott, David Torgerson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Judith WatsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Donna BackSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK ; Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B1 3RB UK.
Paul TonerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Charlie LloydDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Ed DayAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, 4 Windsor Walk, London, SE5 8AF UK ; Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B1 3RB UK.
Louca-Mai BradyIndependent Research Consultant, London, UK.
Lorna TempletonIndependent Research Consultant, Bristol, UK.
Sangeeta AmbegaokarBirmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH UK.
Steve ParrottDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
David TorgersonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Kim CocksDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Eilish GilvarryNorthumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Paul McArdleNorthgate Hospital, Morpeth, NE61 3BP UK.
Alex CopelloSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK ; Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B1 3RB UK.
University of York · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBMental Health Foundation · GBNorthgate Hospital · GBPsychiatry Research Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/60/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of research has identified family interventions to be effective in treating young people's substance use problems. However, despite this evidence, take-up of family-based approaches in the UK has been low. Key factors for this appear to include the resource-intensive nature of most family interventions which challenges implementation and delivery in many service settings and the cultural adaptation of approaches developed in the USA to a UK setting. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting young people to a specifically developed family- and wider social network-based intervention by testing an adapted version of adult social behaviour and network therapy (SBNT).

methodsA pragmatic, randomised controlled, open feasibility trial delivered in two services for young people in the UK. Potential participants are aged 12-18 years referred for drug or alcohol problems to either service. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting young people to a specifically developed family and social network-based intervention. The feasibility and acceptability of this intervention will be measured by recruitment rates, treatment retention, follow-up rates and qualitative interviews. The feasibility of training staff from existing services to deliver this intervention will be explored. Using this opportunity to compare the effectiveness of the intervention against treatment as usual, Timeline Follow-Back interviews will document the proportion of days on which the main problem substance was used in the preceding 90-day period at each assessment point. The economic component will examine the feasibility of conducting a full incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments. The study will also explore and develop models of patient and public involvement which support the involvement of young people in a study of this nature. DISCUSSION: An earlier phase of work adapted social behaviour and network therapy (adult approach) to produce a purpose-designed youth version supported by a therapy manual and associated resources. This was achieved by consultation with young people with experience of services and professionals working in services for young people. This feasibility trial alongside ongoing consultations with young people will offer a meaningful understanding of processes of delivery and implementation.

trial registrationISRCTN93446265; Date ISRCTN assigned 31/05/2013.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityAlcoholDrugsFeasibility studyPatient and public involvementPPIRandomised controlled trialSocial behaviour and network therapyYoung people

Identifiers

PMID27965788
PMCPMC5154128
OpenAlexW2108571971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.