ReviewAsthma research and practice2016
Preacutionary labelling of cross-reactive foods: The case of rapeseed.
Review in Asthma research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapeseed Meal as a Sustainable Source of Proteins, Peptides, and Phenolics: Composition, Interactions, and Functional Potential.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Brassicaceae Mustards: Phytochemical Constituents, Pharmacological Effects, and Mechanisms of Action against Human Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Breeding Canola (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Use of Humanized Fluorescent Reporter Cell Line RBL NFAT-DsRed for the Detection of Allergen-Specific IgE in Patient Sera Using Allergen Microarrays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Development of a DNA Barcoding-Like Approach to Detect Mustard Allergens in Wheat Flours.Genes · 2019Article
- Lupin and Other Potentially Cross-Reactive Allergens in Peanut Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food allergic individuals are exposed to unnecessary dietary restrictions due to precautionary food allergy labelling (PFAL). Two forms of PFAL exist: type I identifies the possible presence of allergenic contaminaion in foods ('may content…'), type II indicates as potentially dangerous ingredients or contaminants that do no belong to official list of food allergens. PFAL type II is based on the fear of cross-reactivity with foods belonging to that list. PFAL type II is less known, but may be tempting for the legal offices of food companies, for clinicians in a 'defensive medicine' key, and even for legislators. We identify here a case of PFAL type II, allergy to rapeseed (belonging to the family of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.