Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2016

A Method for Whole Brain

Anwar S Shatil, Kant M Matsuda, Chase R Figley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MatchingFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Postmortem Intervals on Quantitative MRI in Unfixed and Fixed Swine Brain: Implications for Ex Vivo MRI Applications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and assessment of anImaging science in dentistry · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023
    Article
  13. The BrainboxBrain communications · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anwar S ShatilBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Neuroscience Research Program, Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kant M MatsudaBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Chase R FigleyBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Neuroscience Research Program, Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Manitoba · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-destructive technique that is capable of localizing pathologies and assessing other anatomical features (e.g., tissue volume, microstructure, and white matter connectivity) in postmortem,

Indexed as

ex vivofixationformalinhuman brainMRIneuroimagingpostmortem

Identifiers

PMID27965620
PMCPMC5126074
OpenAlexW2559207392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.