Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2016

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Athletes' Cognitive Performance: An Exploratory Proof of Concept Trial.

Davimar M M Borducchi, July Silveira Gomes, Henrique Akiba, Quirino Cordeiro, José Henrique M Borducchi, Lívia Stocco Sanches Valentin, Gabrielle M Borducchi, Álvaro Machado Dias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Davimar M M BorducchiClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
July Silveira GomesClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Henrique AkibaClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Quirino CordeiroClinical Neuromodulation Laboratory, Santa Casa of São Paulo Medical Science College , São Paulo , Brazil.
José Henrique M BorducchiClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Lívia Stocco Sanches ValentinClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Gabrielle M BorducchiClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Álvaro Machado DiasClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games' unforgettable moments, one could not overlook performances by Phelps and Bolt, which challenge old premises about the maximum extension of individual supremacism in ultracompetitive modalities and the doping scandals. Different media channels resonated these two trends, with an unseen rise on discussions about traits and practices that may set ultrahigh performance athletes apart from the more ordinary ones. Yet, some key issues remain undebated. This paper aims to add to this debate, with a proof of concept trial, which investigates whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may serve as an aid for professional athletes. Ten professional athletes of three different modalities (judo,

Indexed as

athletescognitive performancedopingethicstDCS

Identifiers

PMID27965597
PMCPMC5127844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.