Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965548›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2016

Methodological Problems on the Way to Integrative Human Neuroscience.

Boris Kotchoubey, Felix Tretter, Hans A Braun, Thomas Buchheim, Andreas Draguhn, Thomas Fuchs, Felix Hasler, Heiner Hastedt, Thilo Hinterberger, Georg Northoff and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Human Ecological Perspective and Biopsychosocial Medicine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Boris KotchoubeyInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Felix TretterBertalanffy Centre for the Study of Systems ScienceVienna, Austria; Bavarian Academy for Addiction and Health Issues (BAS)Munich, Germany.
Hans A BraunAG Neurodynamics, Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany.
Thomas BuchheimDepartment of Philosophy I, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Andreas DraguhnInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FuchsDepartment of General Psychiatry, Centre of Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix HaslerBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University of Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Heiner HastedtInstitute of Philosophy, University of Rostock Rostock, Germany.
Thilo HinterbergerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Clinic of Regensburg Regensburg, Germany.
Georg NorthoffInstitute of Mental Health Research: Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ingo RentschlerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Stephan SchleimDepartment of Theory and History of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Stephan SellmaierResearch Centre Neurophilosophy and Ethics of Neuroscience, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Ludger Tebartz Van ElstSection of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Wolfgang TschacherExperimental Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience is a multidisciplinary effort to understand the structures and functions of the brain and brain-mind relations. This effort results in an increasing amount of data, generated by sophisticated technologies. However, these data enhance our

Indexed as

brainmethodologymindneurosciencepsychologysystems science

Identifiers

PMID27965548
PMCPMC5126073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.