Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965287›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2017

Clinical Challenges Associated with Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Endometrial Cancer.

Amanda S Bruegl, Kari L Ring, Molly Daniels, Bryan M Fellman, Diana L Urbauer, Russell R Broaddus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Context-dependent environmental associations with endometrial cancer histotype and genotype.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Endometrial cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  14. Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Variable Expression of MSH6 in Endometrial Carcinomas With Intact Mismatch Repair and With MLH1 Loss Due to MLH1 Methylation.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda S BrueglDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. bruegl@ohsu.edu.
Kari L RingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Molly DanielsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Bryan M FellmanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Diana L UrbauerDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Russell R BroaddusDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal testing for Lynch syndrome is now a routine component of the diagnostic work-up of endometrial cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to identify prospectively the barriers to universal screening based on a tissue testing approach [microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis, IHC for DNA mismatch repair proteins, and MLH1 methylation analysis]. Endometrial carcinoma patients (n = 213) prospectively underwent microsatellite instability and IHC testing for expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. Patients with low (MSI-L) or high (MSI-H) levels of tumor MSI or immunohistochemical loss of MLH1 (and absent MLH1 methylation), MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 were referred to a genetic counselor for consideration of germline testing. Six discordances (3.1% of tested cases) between IHC and MSI were identified. Half of these exhibited heterogeneous immunohistochemical loss of MLH1/PMS2 and were microsatellite stable (MSS). Of the remaining cases, one was MSS with immunohistochemical loss of MSH6, one was MSS with immunohistochemical loss of MLH1/PMS2 and absent MLH1 promoter methylation, and one was MSI-H with intact expression of DNA MMR proteins. Four patients had MSI-L tumors with intact immunohistochemical protein expression; the clinical significance of MSI-L in endometrial cancer is unclear. Eight patients did not have germline mutations despite tissue testing suggesting Lynch syndrome. Including cases with insufficient tissue for testing and patients declining tissue or germline testing, we encountered significant barriers to universal screening in 13.6% of screened patients (29/213) that preclude designation of a tumor as sporadic or hereditary. Cancer Prev Res; 10(2); 108-15. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27965287
PMCPMC5292079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.