Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27965253›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Assessment of a web-based Guided Self-Determination intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes in general practice: a study protocol.

Bjørg Karlsen, Bjørg Oftedal, Silje Stangeland Lie, Berit Rokne, Mark Peyrot, Vibeke Zoffmann, Marit Graue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02575599 (Assessment of a Web-based Guided Self-Determination Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02575599 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of a Web-based Guided Self-Determination Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of StavangerRan2018 to 2020Enrolled172ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsGuided self-determination programme (GSD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Taking a Pause: Co-Designing a Reflection Tool for Meaning Creation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bjørg KarlsenDepartment of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Bjørg OftedalDepartment of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Silje Stangeland LieDepartment of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Berit RokneDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mark PeyrotSociology Department, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vibeke ZoffmannJuliane Marie Centre, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marit GraueCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOLoyola University Maryland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-management is deemed the cornerstone in overall diabetes management. Web-based self-management interventions have potential to support adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in managing their disease. Owing to somewhat ambiguous results of such interventions, interventions should be theory-based and incorporate well-defined counselling methods and techniques for behavioural change. This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a theory-driven web-based Guided Self-Determination (GSD) intervention among adults with T2DM in general practice to improve diabetes self-management behaviours and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A complex intervention design based on the framework of the UK Medical Research Council is employed as a guide for developing the intervention, assessing its feasibility and evaluating its effectiveness. The study consists of three phases: (1) the modelling phase adapting the original GSD programme for adults with T2DM, using a qualitative design, (2) feasibility assessment of the adapted intervention on the web, employing qualitative and quantitative methods and (3) evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention on diabetes self-management behaviours and HbA1c, using a quasi-experimental design. The first phase, which is completed, and the second phase, which is underway, will provide important information about the development of the intervention and its acceptability, whereas the third phase will assess the effectiveness of this systematically developed intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK west number 2015/60) has approved the study design. Patients recruited in the different phases will fill out an informed consent form prior to inclusion and will be guaranteed anonymity and the right to withdraw from the study at any time. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, electronically and in print, and presented at research conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02575599.

Indexed as

InternetPersonal AutonomyAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGeneral PracticeGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleNorwayPractice Guidelines as TopicRegression AnalysisResearch DesignSelf CareGlycated HemoglobinDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID27965253
PMCPMC5168684
OpenAlexW2565146935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.