ArticleBMJ open2016
Assessment of a web-based Guided Self-Determination intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes in general practice: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02575599 (Assessment of a Web-based Guided Self-Determination Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of a Web-based Guided Self-Determination Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of social media and in-person interventions for low back pain conditions in nursing personnel (SMILE).Nursing open · 2021Trial
- Taking a Pause: Co-Designing a Reflection Tool for Meaning Creation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Patients' experiences with participating in a team-based person-centred intervention for patients at risk of or diagnosed with COPD in general practice.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- Article
- Reconfiguring clinical communication in the electronic counselling context: The nuances of disruption.Nursing open · 2019Article
- New Possibilities in Life with Type 2 Diabetes: Experiences from Participating in a Guided Self-Determination Programme in General Practice.Nursing research and practice · 2018Article
- Written reflection in an eHealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Dropout From an eHealth Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- From the challenge of assessing autonomy to the instruments used in practice: A scoping review.Porto biomedical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-management is deemed the cornerstone in overall diabetes management. Web-based self-management interventions have potential to support adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in managing their disease. Owing to somewhat ambiguous results of such interventions, interventions should be theory-based and incorporate well-defined counselling methods and techniques for behavioural change. This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a theory-driven web-based Guided Self-Determination (GSD) intervention among adults with T2DM in general practice to improve diabetes self-management behaviours and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A complex intervention design based on the framework of the UK Medical Research Council is employed as a guide for developing the intervention, assessing its feasibility and evaluating its effectiveness. The study consists of three phases: (1) the modelling phase adapting the original GSD programme for adults with T2DM, using a qualitative design, (2) feasibility assessment of the adapted intervention on the web, employing qualitative and quantitative methods and (3) evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention on diabetes self-management behaviours and HbA1c, using a quasi-experimental design. The first phase, which is completed, and the second phase, which is underway, will provide important information about the development of the intervention and its acceptability, whereas the third phase will assess the effectiveness of this systematically developed intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK west number 2015/60) has approved the study design. Patients recruited in the different phases will fill out an informed consent form prior to inclusion and will be guaranteed anonymity and the right to withdraw from the study at any time. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, electronically and in print, and presented at research conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02575599.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.