Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27964703›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2017

Implications of Epigenetic Mechanisms and their Targets in Cerebral Ischemia Models.

Priya Jhelum, Bhanu C Karisetty, Arvind Kumar, Sumana Chakravarty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Role of DNA Methylation in Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advancement of epigenetics in stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Priya JhelumChemical Biology, CSIR, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India.
Bhanu C KarisettyChemical Biology, CSIR, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India.
Arvind KumarCSIR, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Habsiguda, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India.
Sumana ChakravartyChemical Biology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (IICT), Tarnaka, Hyderabad-500007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the complexities associated with the ischemic condition and identifying therapeutic targets in ischemia is a continued challenge in stroke biology. Emerging evidence reveals the potential involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the incident and outcome of stroke, suggesting novel therapeutic options of targeting different molecules related to epigenetic regulation.

objectiveThis review summarizes our current understanding of ischemic pathophysiology, describes various in vivo and in vitro models of ischemia, and examines epigenetic modifications associated with the ischemic condition.

methodWe focus on microRNAs, DNA methylation, and histone modifying enzymes, and present how epigenetic studies are revealing novel drug target candidates in stroke.

conclusionFinally, we discuss emerging approaches for the prevention and treatment of stroke and post-stroke effects using pharmacological interventions with a wide therapeutic window.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalHumansStrokeangiogenesisHDAC inhibitorsJMJD2 inhibitorsmicro RNAneurogenesisREST complexstroke

Identifiers

PMID27964703
PMCPMC5652028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.