ArticleGM crops & food2017
A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
Article in GM crops & food, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fructans and Fructooligosaccharides in Plants and Fruits: Metabolism, Functional Roles, and Emerging Biotechnological Opportunities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- AI-Guided DNA-Free and Genotype-Independent Genome Editing for Soybean Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- What farmers think about using crop biotechnology to boost photosynthesis in rice and potato.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-enhanced framework for optimizing CRISPR-Cas gene editing in crop biotechnology addressing regulatory challenges and opportunities in global agricultural practices.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Viral vectors for antimicrobial peptide expression: a new path for crop protection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Rethinking gene-edited crop regulation: advancing a Principle-based framework for modern biotechnology governance.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- "They ignore social issues": understanding the diversity of perspectives on plant gene technologies in Indonesia.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Regulation as key to fulfilling the promises of agricultural genomics: Going beyond bottlenecks in plant gene technology development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Unlocking Opportunities and Overcoming Challenges in Genetically Engineered Biofortification.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Genome editing in grain legumes for food security.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Efficient CRISPR/Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Technology for Enhancing Desirable Traits of Fish Species in Aquaculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- The importance of genotyping within the climate-smart plant breeding value chain - integrative tools for genetic enhancement programs.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Recommendations for the Assessment of Potential Environmental Effects of Genome-Editing Applications in Plants in the EU.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- CRISPR technology towards genome editing of the perennial and semi-perennial crops citrus, coffee and sugarcane.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Genetically modified organisms: adapting regulatory frameworks for evolving genome editing technologies.Biological research · 2022Review
- The biological feasibility and social context of gene-edited, caffeine-free coffee.Food science and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global agricultural landscape regarding the commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops is mosaic. Meanwhile, a new plant breeding technique, genome editing is expected to make genetic engineering-mediated crop breeding more socially acceptable because it can be used to develop crop varieties without introducing transgenes, which have hampered the regulatory review and public acceptance of GM crops. The present study revealed that product- and process-based concepts have been implemented to regulate GM crops in 30 countries. Moreover, this study analyzed the regulatory responses to genome-edited crops in the USA, Argentina, Sweden and New Zealand. The findings suggested that countries will likely be divided in their policies on genome-edited crops: Some will deregulate transgene-free crops, while others will regulate all types of crops that have been modified by genome editing. These implications are discussed from the viewpoint of public acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.