Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27960589›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2017

Targeting Cancer Stem Cells with Natural Killer Cell Immunotherapy.

Jesus I Luna, Steven K Grossenbacher, William J Murphy, Robert J Canter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Adoptive NK cell therapy in AML: progress and challenges.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jesus I Lunaa Department of Dermatology , University of California Davis School of Medicine , Sacramento , CA USA.
Steven K Grossenbachera Department of Dermatology , University of California Davis School of Medicine , Sacramento , CA USA.
William J Murphya Department of Dermatology , University of California Davis School of Medicine , Sacramento , CA USA.
Robert J Canterc Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery , University of California Davis School of Medicine , Sacramento , CA USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Positive and Negative Regulation of Natural Killer Cells After BMTR01HL089905 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2007 to 2015
$3.1M
Radio-immunotherapy to Target Cancer Stem Cells in Solid Tumor MalignanciesR01CA189209 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189209NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStandard cytoreductive cancer therapy, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are frequently resisted by a small portion of cancer cells with 'stem-cell' like properties including quiescence and repopulation. Immunotherapy represents a breakthrough modality for improving oncologic outcomes in cancer patients. Since the success of immunotherapy is not contingent on target cell proliferation, it may also be uniquely suited to address the problem of resistance and repopulation exerted by cancer stem cells (CSCs). Areas covered: Natural killer (NK) cells have long been known for their ability to reject allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells, and there are increasing data demonstrating that NK cells can selectively identify and lyse CSCs. The authors review the current knowledge of CSCs and NK cells and highlight recent studies that support the concept that NK cells are capable of targeting CSC in solid tumors, especially in the context of combination therapy simultaneously targeting non-CSCs and CSCs. Expert opinion: Unlike cytotoxic cancer treatments, NK cells can target and eliminate quiescent/non-proliferating cells such as CSCs, and these enigmatic cells are an important source of relapse and metastasis. NK targeting of CSCs represents a novel and potentially high impact method to capitalize on the intrinsic therapeutic potential of NK cells.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsALDHcancer stem cellsCD133CD24CD44MICA/MICBnatural killer cells

Identifiers

PMID27960589
PMCPMC5311007
OpenAlexW2565308587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.