Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27960008›Full record

ArticleALTEX2017

A tiered, Bayesian approach to estimating of population variability for regulatory decision-making.

Weihsueh A Chiu, Fred A Wright, Ivan Rusyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ALTEX, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Technical evaluation and standardization of the human thyroid microtissue assay.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  15. Decision-Making with New Approach Methodologies: Time to Replace Default Uncertainty Factors with Data.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A new approach method for characterizing inter-species toxicodynamic variability.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weihsueh A ChiuDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Fred A WrightBioinformatics Research Center and Departments of Statistics and Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS OF FLOW AND TRANSPORT PHENOMENAP42ES005948 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRY, REBECCA · 1992 to 2017
$45.4M
TARGETED GENOMICS FACILITY COREP30ES023512 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI DEUTZ, NICOLAAS E · 2014 to 2017
$3.3M
FACILITATING GTEx, DISEASE, AND GxE ANALYSES VIA FAST EXPRESSION (e)QTL MAPPINGR01MH090936 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NOBEL, ANDREW B, RUSYN, IVAN · 2010 to 2012
$847k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023512NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES005948NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing human variability in susceptibility to chemical toxicity is a critical issue in regulatory decision-making, but is usually addressed by a default 10-fold safety/uncertainty factor. Feasibility of population-based in vitro experimental approaches to more accurately estimate human variability was demonstrated recently using a large (~1000) panel of lymphoblastoid cell lines. However, routine use of such a large population-based model poses cost and logistical challenges. We hypothesize that a Bayesian approach embedded in a tiered workflow provides efficient estimation of variability and enables a tailored and sensible approach to selection of appropriate sample size. We used the previously collected lymphoblastoid cell line in vitro toxicity data to develop a data-derived prior distribution for the uncertainty in the degree of population variability. The resulting prior for the toxicodynamic variability factor (the ratio between the median and 1% most sensitive individuals) has a median (90% CI) of 2.5 (1.4-9.6). We then performed computational experiments using a hierarchical Bayesian population model with lognormal population variability with samples sizes of n = 5 to 100 to determine the change in precision and accuracy with increasing sample size. We propose a tiered Bayesian strategy for fit-for-purpose population variability estimates: (1) a default using the data-derived prior distribution; (2) a pilot experiment using samples sizes of ~20 individuals that reduces prior uncertainty by > 50% with > 80% balanced accuracy for classification; and (3) a high confidence experiment using sample sizes of ~50-100. This approach efficiently uses in vitro data on population variability to inform decision-making.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDecision MakingCell LineHumansRisk AssessmentToxicity TestsUncertaintyBayesianin vitrouncertaintyvariability

Identifiers

PMID27960008
PMCPMC5468494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.