ArticlePloS one2016
BEMER Electromagnetic Field Therapy Reduces Cancer Cell Radioresistance by Enhanced ROS Formation and Induced DNA Damage.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Tumor Treating Fields: Multimodal Antitumor Action and the Clinical Potential of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Precise metabolomics identifies glycolysis-related pyruvate kinase M activity as regulator of the S-phase-specific radiation response in triple-negative breast cancer cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Enhanced Antiproliferative Activity of Docetaxel by Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Static magnetic field promotes the doxorubicin toxicity effects on osteosarcoma cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cancer metastasis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Spinning magnetic field patterns that cause oncolysis by oxidative stress in glioma cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A mechanistically approached review upon assorted cell lines stimulated by athermal electromagnetic irradiation.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2023Review
- Electromagnetic fields regulate calcium-mediated cell fate of stem cells: osteogenesis, chondrogenesis and apoptosis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- A Novel Method to Achieve Precision and Reproducibility in Exposure Parameters for Low-Frequency Pulsed Magnetic Fields in Human Cell Cultures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- NUPR1 contributes to radiation resistance by maintaining ROS homeostasis via AhR/CYP signal axis in hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk factors of acute myeloid leukemia.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Electromagnetic stimulation increases mitochondrial function in osteogenic cells and promotes bone fracture repair.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- miRNA-218-5p increases cell sensitivity by inhibiting PRKDC activity in radiation-resistant lung carcinoma cells.Thoracic cancer · 2021Article
- Progressive Study on the Non-thermal Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy in Oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields (LF-MFs) Inhibit Proliferation by Triggering Apoptosis and Altering Cell Cycle Distribution in Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Pulsed Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields Induce Tumor Membrane Disruption and Altered Cell Viability.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Article
- 1α,25(OH)Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- ROS-Mediated Therapeutic Strategy in Chemo-/Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Each year more than 450,000 Germans are expected to be diagnosed with cancer subsequently receiving standard multimodal therapies including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. On top, molecular-targeted agents are increasingly administered. Owing to intrinsic and acquired resistance to these therapeutic approaches, both the better molecular understanding of tumor biology and the consideration of alternative and complementary therapeutic support are warranted and open up broader and novel possibilities for therapy personalization. Particularly the latter is underpinned by the increasing utilization of non-invasive complementary and alternative medicine by the population. One investigated approach is the application of low-dose electromagnetic fields (EMF) to modulate cellular processes. A particular system is the BEMER therapy as a Physical Vascular Therapy for which a normalization of the microcirculation has been demonstrated by a low-frequency, pulsed EMF pattern. Open remains whether this EMF pattern impacts on cancer cell survival upon treatment with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and the molecular-targeted agent Cetuximab inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Using more physiological, three-dimensional, matrix-based cell culture models and cancer cell lines originating from lung, head and neck, colorectal and pancreas, we show significant changes in distinct intermediates of the glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid cycle pathways and enhanced cancer cell radiosensitization associated with increased DNA double strand break numbers and higher levels of reactive oxygen species upon BEMER treatment relative to controls. Intriguingly, exposure of cells to the BEMER EMF pattern failed to result in sensitization to chemotherapy and Cetuximab. Further studies are necessary to better understand the mechanisms underlying the cellular alterations induced by the BEMER EMF pattern and to clarify the application areas for human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.