ArticlePLoS medicine2016
Predictors of Chemosensitivity in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: An Integrated Genomic Analysis.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with Nab-Paclitaxel and Dose-Dense Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- Eribulin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer patients stratified by homologous recombination deficiency status: a multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Trial
- Analysis of Pre- and Posttreatment Tissues from the SWOG S0800 Trial Reveals an Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Breast Cancer Genome.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Beyond Molecular Classification in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Toward Subtype-Guided Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene expression: p53- and cell cycle-dependent repression requires RB and DREAM.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- Systemic chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC polarizes effector T cell differentiation.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Targeting YES1 Disrupts Mitotic Fidelity and Potentiates the Response to Taxanes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2024Article
- Identification of TUBB2A as a Cancer-Immunity Cycle-Related Therapeutic Target in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
- Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is worse in BRCA mutation positive breast cancer patients prior to cancer treatment and premature menopause.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Subtype-Specific Survival of Young Women with Breast Cancer and Its Interaction with the Germline BRCA Status.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Prognostic Risk Signature of Two Autophagy-Related Genes for Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Outcomes.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2024Article
- Development of 42 marker panel for in-depth study of cancer associated fibroblast niches in breast cancer using imaging mass cytometry.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Review
- Anti-Tumor Immunity and Preoperative Radiovaccination: Emerging New Concepts in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combined small cell lung cancer: current progress and unmet needs.American journal of cancer research · 2023Review
- Sulindac sulfide as a non-immune suppressive γ-secretase modulator to target triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- RNA-Based Classification of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Racially Diverse Patients with Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
- Advances of Epigenetic Biomarkers and Epigenome Editing for Early Diagnosis in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive disease, and although no effective targeted therapies are available to date, about one-third of patients with TNBC achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) from standard-of-care anthracycline/taxane (ACT) chemotherapy. The heterogeneity of these tumors, however, has hindered the discovery of effective biomarkers to identify such patients. METHODS AND
findingsWe performed whole exome sequencing on 29 TNBC cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) selected because they had either pCR (n = 18) or extensive residual disease (n = 11) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n = 144) and METABRIC (n = 278) cohorts serving as validation cohorts. Our analysis revealed that mutations in the AR- and FOXA1-regulated networks, in which BRCA1 plays a key role, are associated with significantly higher sensitivity to ACT chemotherapy in the MDACC cohort (pCR rate of 94.1% compared to 16.6% in tumors without mutations in AR/FOXA1 pathway, adjusted p = 0.02) and significantly better survival outcome in the TCGA TNBC cohort (log-rank test, p = 0.05). Combined analysis of DNA sequencing, DNA methylation, and RNA sequencing identified tumors of a distinct BRCA-deficient (BRCA-D) TNBC subtype characterized by low levels of wild-type BRCA1/2 expression. Patients with functionally BRCA-D tumors had significantly better survival with standard-of-care chemotherapy than patients whose tumors were not BRCA-D (log-rank test, p = 0.021), and they had significantly higher mutation burden (p < 0.001) and presented clonal neoantigens that were associated with increased immune cell activity. A transcriptional signature of BRCA-D TNBC tumors was independently validated to be significantly associated with improved survival in the METABRIC dataset (log-rank test, p = 0.009). As a retrospective study, limitations include the small size and potential selection bias in the discovery cohort.
conclusionsThe comprehensive molecular analysis presented in this study directly links BRCA deficiency with increased clonal mutation burden and significantly enhanced chemosensitivity in TNBC and suggests that functional RNA-based BRCA deficiency needs to be further examined in TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.