Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27959450›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2017

Chemoradiotherapy and concurrent radiofrequency thermal therapy to treat primary rectal cancer and prediction of treatment responses.

Hisanori Shoji, Masahiko Motegi, Yosuke Takakusagi, Takayuki Asao, Hiroyuki Kuwano, Takeo Takahashi, Kyoji Ogoshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hisanori ShojiDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma 370-0001, Japan.
Masahiko MotegiDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma 370-0001, Japan.
Yosuke TakakusagiOncology Center, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma 370-0001, Japan.
Takayuki AsaoInitiative for Advanced Research, Gunma University, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Hiroyuki KuwanoDepartment of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Takeo TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-8550, Japan.
Kyoji OgoshiDivision of Cancer Diagnosis and Cancer Treatment, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma 370-0001, Japan.
Hidaka Hospital · JPGunma University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate a previously reported predictive formula of output-limiting symptoms induced by radiofrequency (RF) to determine the efficacy of this neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR) and concurrent RF thermal therapy. The present study included 81 consecutive patients with confirmed diagnoses of rectal adenocarcinoma that was localized in the mid-low rectum (up to 12 cm from the anal verge) who received NACR [intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), 50 Gy/25 fractions, capecitabine 1,700 mg/m2/day for 5 days/week)] with concurrent thermal therapy (Thermotron-RF8, once a week for 5 weeks with 50 min irradiation). Patients with progressive disease (PD) did not receive RF outputs higher than the predicted value. Some patients who were predicted to receive more output in fact received more than the predicted output. In patients who were predicted to receive moderately higher outputs, 37.5% of the patients experienced pathological complete responses, which was the highest rate, while in those who did not receive more than the predicted output, 66.7% of the patients experienced PD, which was the highest rate in the present study. We speculate that RF thermal therapy may offset the chemoradiation effects in some patients. Adding thermal therapy as a multimodality therapy to NACR potentially affects patients with lower predicted outputs and actual observed outputs slightly higher than the predictive value. Our predictive equation for initial energy output, in which output‑limiting symptoms can be used to predict treatment efficacy, consequently, can be used to decide whether to continue this treatment modality.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationChemoradiotherapyHyperthermia, InducedAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID27959450
PMCPMC5355662
OpenAlexW2559855932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.