Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27957332›Full record

ArticleJournal of therapeutic ultrasound2016

Uncertainty estimation for temperature measurement with diagnostic ultrasound.

Tina A Fuhrmann, Olga Georg, Julian Haller, Klaus-V Jenderka, Volker Wilkens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of therapeutic ultrasound, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tina A FuhrmannDepartment of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Eberhard-Leibnitz-Strasse 2, Merseburg, 06217 Germany.
Olga GeorgPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, Braunschweig, 38116 Germany.
Julian HallerPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, Braunschweig, 38116 Germany.
Klaus-V JenderkaDepartment of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Eberhard-Leibnitz-Strasse 2, Merseburg, 06217 Germany.
Volker WilkensPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, Braunschweig, 38116 Germany.
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt · DEMerseburg University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound therapies are promising, non-invasive applications with potential to significantly improve, e.g. cancer therapies like viro- or immunotherapy or surgical applications. However, a crucial step towards their breakthrough is still missing: affordable and easy-to-handle quality assurance tools for therapy devices and ways to verify treatment planning algorithms. This deficiency limits the safety and comparability of treatments.

methodsTo overcome this deficiency accurate spatial and temporal temperature maps could be used. In this paper, the suitability of temperature calculation based on time-shifts of diagnostic ultrasound backscattered signals (echo-time-shift) is investigated and associated uncertainties are estimated. Different analysis variations were used to calculate the time-shifts: discrete and continuous methods as well as different frames as a reference for temperature calculation (4 s before, 16 s before the frame of interest, base frame). A sigmoid function was fitted and used to calculate temperatures. Two-dimensional temperature maps recorded during and after therapeutic ultrasound sonication were examined. All experiments were performed in agar-graphite phantoms mimicking non-fatty tissue, with high-intensity focused ultrasound being the source of heating.

resultsContinuous methods are more accurate than discrete ones, and uncertainties of calculated temperatures are in general lower, the earlier the reference frame was recorded. Depending on the purpose of the measurement, a compromise has to be made between the following: calculation accuracy (early reference frame), tolerance towards small movements (late reference frame), reproducing large temperature changes or cooling processes (reference frame at a certain point in time), speed of the algorithm (discrete (fast) vs. continuous (slower) shift calculation), and spatial accuracy (interval size for index-shift calculation). Within the range from 20 °C to 44 °C, uncertainties as low as 12.4 % are possible, being mainly due to medium properties.

conclusionsTemperature measurements using the echo-time-shift method might be useful for validation of treatment plan algorithms. This might also be a comparatively accurate, fast, and affordable method for laboratory and clinical quality assessment. Further research is necessary to improve filter algorithms and to extend this method to multiple foci and the usage of temperature-dependent tissue quantities. We used an analytical approach to investigate the uncertainties of temperature measurement. Different analysis variations are compared to determine temperature distribution and development over time.

Indexed as

AccuracyDosimetryEcho-time-shift methodHIFUQuality assessmentSafetyUltrasound therapyUltrasound thermometryUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27957332
PMCPMC5131492
OpenAlexW2535701968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.