ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2016
Different modalities for treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A Randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of lower-level laser therapy on the treatment of minor recurrent aphthous ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Laser therapy versus placebo treatment for aphthous ulcers: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of lasers in the management of recurrent aphthous ulcers of oral cavity: a systematic review of randomized control trials.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Topical Licorice for Aphthous: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Photobiomodulation in recurrent aphthous stomatitis management using three different laser wavelengths. A randomized clinical trial.Lasers in medical science · 2024Trial
- Advances in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: from synthetic and natural drugs to novel drug delivery systems.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Healing of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis by Non-Thermal Plasma: Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Reducing Pain of Oral Mucosal Diseases: A Case Series.International medical case reports journal · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Topical Intervention for Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- How to transfer traditional knowledge about medicinal herbs? or TCM plants: a black box for modern oncologists.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Review
- How to bridge the gap? European medical plants used for treating oral mucositis: on the search for evidence.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Low-Level Laser Therapy and Topical Medications for Treating Aphthous Ulcers: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe underlying etiology of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is unclear and treatment aims to provide symptomatic and faster relief. This study compared the efficacy of diode laser, a herbal combination of Acacia nilotica and Licorice (A and L) and Amlexanox in the management of RAS. MATERIAL AND
methodsSixty patients with minor aphthae were selected and randomly divided into four groups of 15 each. Group I and II received adhesive preparations of a herbal mixture of A and L and a 2 mg Amlexanox paste respectively, group III received diode laser and the fourth group (control) used a placebo. Ulcer size, pain score were recorded on days 1, 2 and 5.
resultsLaser group showed the statistically highest mean percentage (%) of reduction in pain scores and ulcer size than the other groups. The mean % of reduction in pain scores was 43.3+20.0 at day 2 and 67.8+21.5 % at day 5 in the laser group while Amlexanox group demonstrated a 29.8 +11.3 and 61.9+24.5 mean % of reduction in pain scores at day 2 and 5 respectively. A and L group showed a lower mean % of reduction in pain scores than laser and Amlexanox groups with a 22.2+10.5 and 43.4+15.8 mean % reduction in pain scores at day 2 and day 5 respectively. Similarly the highest mean % of reduction in ulcer size was seen in the laser group being 52.7+19.8 at day 2 and 85.1+22.0 at day 5, while it was 48.1+16.5 at day 2 and 77.8+28.7 at day 5 in the Amlexanox group and 42.0+11.5 at day 2 and 63.0+20.5 at day 5 in the A and L group.
conclusionsAll treatment modalities reduced pain and ulcer size than placebo group. Laser therapy demonstrated the highest percentage of reduction of pain score and ulcer size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.