ArticleGastroenterology research2011
Predicting Acute Pancreatitis Severity: Comparison of Prognostic Scores.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study Between Various Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.Cureus · 2025Article
- A deep learning-powered diagnostic model for acute pancreatitis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- A new logistic regression model for early prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis using magnetic resonance imaging and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring systems.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis.World journal of critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- A 78-year-old male with inferior ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram, diabetic ketoacidosis and acute pancreatitis.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2020Article
- Article
- Can C-reactive Protein Increase the Efficiency of the Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Scoring System?Cureus · 2019Article
- Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2018Article
- Clinical profile, etiology, and outcome of acute pancreatitis: Experience at a tertiary care center.Annals of African medicineArticle
- Current concepts in the management of acute pancreatitis.Journal of family medicine and primary careReview
- Improved outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis with generated data and advanced machine learning algorithms.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute pancreatitis has a broad clinical spectrum, from mild illness to multiple organ failure and death. Prognostic scores have been developed or adapted to predict disease severity. This study aimed to compare the prognostic scores according to sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve. Statistical correlation with disease severity, length of hospital stay, mortality and complication rates.
methodsRetrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis over a ten year period. Evaluation of prognostic scores: Ranson, Glasgow-Imrie, Balthazar, APACHE II (admission and at 48 hours) and C-reactive protein (48 hours), was carried out as well as statistical analysis using Microsoft Excel 2007® and SPSS 16®. The confidence interval used was 95%.
resultsData from 193 clinical files was collected. However, 67 were excluded due to lack of information. According to the Atlanta criteria, 90 cases were deemed as mild and 36 severe. The mortality rate was 6% and the local complication rate was 9.3%. Ranson, Glasgow and APACHE II scores had significant correlation with mortality. Apart from C-reactive protein levels at 48 hours, all scores had significant correlation with disease severity. The scores with best area under the curve correlation were APACHE II (48 hours): 0.892, Ranson: 0.879, and APACHE II (admission): 0.861.
conclusionsThe most accurate prognostic scores in this study were APACHE II (48 hours) and Ranson. APACHE II at admission was a good indicator, impaired only by high false positive ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.