Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27957018›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research2011

Predicting Acute Pancreatitis Severity: Comparison of Prognostic Scores.

Marco Simoes, Patricia Alves, Helder Esperto, Catarina Canha, Elisa Meira, Erica Ferreira, Manuel Gomes, Isabel Fonseca, Benilde Barbosa, Jose Nascimento Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current concepts in the management of acute pancreatitis.Journal of family medicine and primary care
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco SimoesInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Patricia AlvesInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Helder EspertoInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Catarina CanhaInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Elisa MeiraInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Erica FerreiraInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Manuel GomesInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Isabel FonsecaInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Benilde BarbosaInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.
Jose Nascimento CostaInternal Medicine Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis has a broad clinical spectrum, from mild illness to multiple organ failure and death. Prognostic scores have been developed or adapted to predict disease severity. This study aimed to compare the prognostic scores according to sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve. Statistical correlation with disease severity, length of hospital stay, mortality and complication rates.

methodsRetrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis over a ten year period. Evaluation of prognostic scores: Ranson, Glasgow-Imrie, Balthazar, APACHE II (admission and at 48 hours) and C-reactive protein (48 hours), was carried out as well as statistical analysis using Microsoft Excel 2007® and SPSS 16®. The confidence interval used was 95%.

resultsData from 193 clinical files was collected. However, 67 were excluded due to lack of information. According to the Atlanta criteria, 90 cases were deemed as mild and 36 severe. The mortality rate was 6% and the local complication rate was 9.3%. Ranson, Glasgow and APACHE II scores had significant correlation with mortality. Apart from C-reactive protein levels at 48 hours, all scores had significant correlation with disease severity. The scores with best area under the curve correlation were APACHE II (48 hours): 0.892, Ranson: 0.879, and APACHE II (admission): 0.861.

conclusionsThe most accurate prognostic scores in this study were APACHE II (48 hours) and Ranson. APACHE II at admission was a good indicator, impaired only by high false positive ratio.

Indexed as

Acute PancreatitisAPACHE IIBalthazarC-reactive ProteinGlasgowPrognostic ScoresRanson

Identifiers

PMID27957018
PMCPMC5139846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.